We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Diagnostic classification of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement in myopic eyes: a comparison between time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2011 October
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic classification of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurement between time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) in myopic eyes.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
METHODS: A total of 97 eyes from 97 healthy myopic subjects were included. The RNFL in each eye was imaged sequentially with the Stratus OCT and the Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec). With reference to the built-in normative database, the number of abnormal diagnostic classifications (borderline or outside normal limits) in each OCT device was analyzed and compared using the likelihood ratio chi-square test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with abnormal diagnostic classification.
RESULTS: The Cirrus HD-OCT classified a significantly higher percentage of eyes as outside normal limits/borderline in at least 1 clock hour (Stratus, 14.4%/24.8%; Cirrus, 21.6%/34.1%; all P < .01). RNFL measurement at 1 (23.6%) and 2 o'clock (23.5%) of all eyes was the most frequent location classified as abnormal by the Cirrus HD-OCT and the Stratus OCT, respectively. Eyes with smaller optic disc and longer axial length were more likely to have abnormal diagnostic classification.
CONCLUSIONS: In myopic eyes, Cirrus HD-OCT was more likely to have abnormal diagnostic classification than the Stratus OCT.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
METHODS: A total of 97 eyes from 97 healthy myopic subjects were included. The RNFL in each eye was imaged sequentially with the Stratus OCT and the Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec). With reference to the built-in normative database, the number of abnormal diagnostic classifications (borderline or outside normal limits) in each OCT device was analyzed and compared using the likelihood ratio chi-square test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with abnormal diagnostic classification.
RESULTS: The Cirrus HD-OCT classified a significantly higher percentage of eyes as outside normal limits/borderline in at least 1 clock hour (Stratus, 14.4%/24.8%; Cirrus, 21.6%/34.1%; all P < .01). RNFL measurement at 1 (23.6%) and 2 o'clock (23.5%) of all eyes was the most frequent location classified as abnormal by the Cirrus HD-OCT and the Stratus OCT, respectively. Eyes with smaller optic disc and longer axial length were more likely to have abnormal diagnostic classification.
CONCLUSIONS: In myopic eyes, Cirrus HD-OCT was more likely to have abnormal diagnostic classification than the Stratus OCT.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app