Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Erosion of the long process of the incus in revision stapes surgery: malleovestibular prosthesis or incus reconstruction with hydroxyapatite bone cement?

OBJECTIVE: To study hearing outcome in revision stapedotomy cases where extensive erosion of the long process of the incus was observed in a consecutive series where a malleovestibular prosthesis was used versus a consecutive series where hydroxyapatite (HA) bone cement was used to rebuild the eroded long process of the incus and integrate the prosthesis.

PATIENTS: Twenty revision cases of surgically treated otosclerosis where extensive incus erosion was observed during revision surgery.

INTERVENTION: In the earlier consecutive series, 10 cases were treated with malleovestibular prostheses. In the later consecutive series, 10 cases were treated with HA bone cement to rebuild the incus-prosthesis interface.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Air-bone gap, bone-conduction thresholds, and air-conduction thresholds were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 to 3 months. Last audiometry available also was reported (median, 12 mo). Pure-tone averages were calculated according to the guidelines of the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium for the evaluation of conductive hearing loss. Raw data were displayed in an Amsterdam Hearing Evaluation Plot.

RESULTS: Six male patients and 14 female patients were included. Age varied from 34 to 75 years (median, 53 yr). The median postoperative air-bone gap at last follow-up audiometry was 15.6 in the malleovestibular prosthesis group and 13.1 dB in the HA bone cement group. No short-term or intermediate-term adverse reactions or unsuspected bone conduction deteriorations were seen.

CONCLUSION: HA bone cement can be successfully used to reconstruct the long process of the incus in case of extensive erosion of the long process. Intermediate-term hearing outcome is comparable to the outcome of a series of similar cases treated with malleovestibular prostheses. Because the placement of a malleovestibular prosthesis is technically more difficult and presents a high risk to the inner ear, we think HA bone cement can be a useful alternative in these difficult cases.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app