Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Thumb basal joint arthroplasty using abductor pollicis longus tendon: an average 5.5-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the 4-year minimum (5.5-y average) results of trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction using a modified Thompson technique with the abductor pollicis longus tendon for the primary treatment of advanced-stage basal joint arthritis (Eaton stages III and IV).

METHODS: We evaluated 25 thumbs in 18 patients after ligament reconstruction arthroplasty for surgical treatment of advanced thumb basal joint arthritis. Treatment consisted of piecemeal excision of the entire trapezium, ligament reconstruction and interposition using the abductor pollicis longus tendon, and 8 weeks of K-wire immobilization of the thumb metacarpal. We evaluated range of motion, lateral pinch, tip pinch, grip strength, and outcomes questionnaires including the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 Short Form before and at an average of 5.5 years after surgery.

RESULTS: Seventeen of 18 patients reported excellent or good relief of pain and were satisfied with their operation, and all of the patients would have the operation again. Of the 25 thumbs, 24 adducted fully into the plane of the palm and opposed to the fifth metacarpal head. Preoperative and postoperative strength comparisons demonstrated an average increase in grip, key pinch, and tip pinch strength of 14%, 12%, and 6%, respectively. The outcomes data demonstrated noteworthy improvement in writing, buttoning a shirt, turning a key/lock, and arthritis pain categories.

CONCLUSIONS: This technique restored a stable, pain-free thumb that yielded excellent strength and motion at an average of 5.5 years after the procedure. Compared with published reports of techniques that use hematoma distraction or harvest of all or part of the flexor carpi radialis tendon, this modified Thompson technique has similar pain relief, satisfaction, and motion but had less improvement in strength, which might have resulted from differences in the studied samples.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app