We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Are polyaxially locked screws advantageous in the plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly? A prospective randomized clinical observational study.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2011 October
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of plate osteosynthesis using either polyaxial or nonpolyaxially locked screw-plate systems in proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized.
SETTING: Level I trauma center.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients (older than 60 years) with isolated, displaced three- and four-part fractures were included. Twenty-five patients (median age, 75.5 years) were randomized to a polyaxial locking screw plate (Group 1), whereas 31 patients (median age, 72 years) were treated with a locking screw plate (Group 2). Follow-up evaluations were performed 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using the Simple Shoulder Test, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Constant score as well as radiographs. The results and the complications were compared between both groups.
RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were available for follow-up (Group 1, 20 of 25; Group 2, 28 of 31). The Simple Shoulder Test, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Constant score improved significantly from 3 to 12 months and did not differ between groups. Twelve months after the index procedure, the Simple Shoulder Test score was 8.6 ± 3.2 points in Group 1 and 9.7 ± 1.8 points in Group 2. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 17.8 ± 16.2 in Group 1 and 15.7 ± 11.8 in Group 2. The mean Constant score amounted to 73% ± 17% in Group 1 and 81% ± 13% in Group 2. There were six complications in Group 1 and eight in Group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the functional outcomes and the rate of complications after polyaxial locked plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients were comparable to those treated with nonpolyaxial implants. Despite the theoretical advantages of polyaxial locked plating in proximal humerus fractures, this study could not show a verifiable clinical advantage of these plates.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized.
SETTING: Level I trauma center.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients (older than 60 years) with isolated, displaced three- and four-part fractures were included. Twenty-five patients (median age, 75.5 years) were randomized to a polyaxial locking screw plate (Group 1), whereas 31 patients (median age, 72 years) were treated with a locking screw plate (Group 2). Follow-up evaluations were performed 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using the Simple Shoulder Test, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Constant score as well as radiographs. The results and the complications were compared between both groups.
RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were available for follow-up (Group 1, 20 of 25; Group 2, 28 of 31). The Simple Shoulder Test, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Constant score improved significantly from 3 to 12 months and did not differ between groups. Twelve months after the index procedure, the Simple Shoulder Test score was 8.6 ± 3.2 points in Group 1 and 9.7 ± 1.8 points in Group 2. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 17.8 ± 16.2 in Group 1 and 15.7 ± 11.8 in Group 2. The mean Constant score amounted to 73% ± 17% in Group 1 and 81% ± 13% in Group 2. There were six complications in Group 1 and eight in Group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the functional outcomes and the rate of complications after polyaxial locked plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients were comparable to those treated with nonpolyaxial implants. Despite the theoretical advantages of polyaxial locked plating in proximal humerus fractures, this study could not show a verifiable clinical advantage of these plates.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app