JOURNAL ARTICLE

Dynamic microbubble contrast-enhanced US to measure tumor response to targeted therapy: a proposed clinical protocol with results from renal cell carcinoma patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy

Ross Williams, John M Hudson, Brendan A Lloyd, Ahthavan R Sureshkumar, Gordon Lueck, Laurent Milot, Mostafa Atri, Georg A Bjarnason, Peter N Burns
Radiology 2011, 260 (2): 581-90
21555352

PURPOSE: To develop and implement an evidence-based protocol for characterizing vascular response of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to targeted therapy by using dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) ultrasonography (US).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional research ethics board; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Seventeen patients (four women; median age, 58 years; range, 42-72 years; 13 men, median age, 62 years; range, 45-81 years) with metastatic RCC were examined by using DCE US before and after 2 weeks of treatment with sunitinib (May 2007 to October 2009). Two contrast agent techniques--bolus injection and disruption-replenishment infusion of microbubbles--were compared. Changes in tumor blood velocity and fractional blood volume were measured with both methods, together with reproducibility and effect of compensation for respiratory motion. Tumor changes were assessed with computed tomography, by using the best response with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and progression-free survival (PFS). Follow-up RECIST measurements were performed at 6-week intervals until progressive disease was detected.

RESULTS: In response to treatment, median tumor fractional blood volume measured with the disruption-replenishment infusion method decreased by 73.2% (interquartile range, 46%-87%) (P < .002), with repeated-measure reproducibility of 9%-15%. Significant decreases were also seen with the bolus method, but with poor correlation of changes in bolus peak (r = 0.46, P = .066) and area under the curve (r = 0.47, P = .058), compared with infusion measurements. Changes in DCE US parameters over 2 weeks did not correlate with PFS and could not be used to predict long-term assessment of best response by using RECIST. Follow-up times ranged 28-501 days; the median was 164 days.

CONCLUSION: DCE US provides reproducible and sensitive assessment of vascular changes in response to antiangiogenic therapy. The disruption-replenishment infusion protocol is a flexible method suitable for many tumor types, but further studies are needed to assess whether this protocol may be predictive of patient outcome.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
21555352
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"