JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet

Amit Rastogi, Sachin Wani, Neil Gupta, Vikas Singh, Srinivas Gaddam, Savio Reddymasu, Ozlem Ulusarac, Fang Fan, Maria Romanas, Katie L Dennis, Prateek Sharma, Ajay Bansal, Melissa Oropeza-Vail, Mojtaba Olyaee
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011, 74 (1): 58-64
21514932

BACKGROUND: Most endosonographers use an EUS needle with an internal stylet during EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA). Reinserting the stylet into the needle after every pass is tedious and time-consuming, and there are no data to suggest that it improves the quality of the cytology specimen.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the samples obtained by EUS-FNA with and without a stylet for (1) the degree of cellularity, adequacy, contamination, and amount of blood and (2) the diagnostic yield of malignancy.

DESIGN: Prospective,single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING: Two tertiary care referral centers.

PATIENTS: Patients referred for EUS-FNA of solid lesions.

INTERVENTION: Patients underwent EUS-FNA of the solid lesions, and 2 passes each were made with a stylet and without a stylet in the needle. The order of the passes was randomized, and the cytopathologists reviewing the slides were blinded to the stylet status of passes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Degree of cellularity, adequacy, contamination, amount of blood, and the diagnostic yield of malignancy in the specimens.

RESULTS: A total of 101 patients with 118 lesions were included in final analysis; 236 FNA passes were made, each with and without a stylet. No significant differences were seen in the cellularity (P = .98), adequacy of the specimen (P = .26), contamination (P = .92), or significant amount of blood (P = .61) between specimens obtained with and without a stylet. The diagnostic yield of malignancy was 55 of 236 specimens (23%) in the with-stylet group compared with 66 of 236 specimens (28%) in the without-stylet group (P = .29).

LIMITATIONS: Endosonographers were not blinded to the stylet status of the passes.

CONCLUSIONS: Using a stylet during EUS-FNA does not confer any significant advantage with regard to the quality of the specimen obtained or the diagnostic yield of malignancy. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT 01213290).

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
21514932
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"