Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical characteristics and survival in systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease.

Chest 2011 October
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) complicating systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) is usually associated with a poor prognosis. However, data are either lacking or scarce on prognostic factors in this condition. The objectives of this study were to compare the survival of patients with ILD-associated PH (PH-ILD) or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and to determine whether the severity of PH has prognostic value in SSc-associated PH-ILD.

METHODS: Consecutive patients with SSc and PH-ILD (n = 47) or PAH (n = 50) confirmed by right-sided heart catheterization were included in a cross-sectional analysis. PH was classified as mild (mean pulmonary arterial pressure [mPAP] ≤ 35 mm Hg) or moderate to severe (mPAP > 35 mm Hg).

RESULTS: As compared with patients with PAH, subjects with PH-ILD were younger, were more frequently men with a history of smoking, had more frequently diffuse SSc, less frequently anticentromere antibodies, and a lower FVC/diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ratio. They had a worse prognosis than patients with PAH (3-year survival of 47% vs 71%, respectively; P = .07). Patients with mild PH-ILD had similar poor outcomes when compared with those with moderate to severe PH-ILD. Pericardial effusion (hazard ratio [HR], 2.44; P = .04) and lower DLCO (HR, 0.96; P = .01) were the only independent factors predictive of a poor survival in the PH-ILD group.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SSc with PH-ILD had a different phenotype and a worse prognosis than those with SSc and PAH. Lower DLCO and presence of pericardial effusion were predictive of a poor outcome in PH-ILD, whereas mPAP seemed to have no prognostic significance.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app