We have located links that may give you full text access.
Root cause analysis of internal hernia and Roux limb compression after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using observational clinical human reliability assessment.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 2012 March
BACKGROUND: Internal hernia (IH) and Roux limb compression (RC) are recognized complications after retrocolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity. The aim of the present study was to systematically identify the surgical technical errors leading to these complications.
METHODS: An observational clinical human reliability assessment approach was used to analyze the operating videos of 3 groups: an IH group (n = 12), a Roux compression group (n = 13), and a control group (no complications, n = 21). Two investigators, unaware of the outcomes, reviewed all videos, using special rating software. All errors were categorized using the external error mode system and further described if a direct consequential error (e.g., bleeding) was found.
RESULTS: An analysis of data showed that, on average, more errors occurred in the complication groups than in the control group (IH 5.85, Roux compression 3.54, control .90, P < .001). The strongest differences were found for missing intermesenteric stitches on both sides of the Roux limb. Logistic regression analysis showed that a missed stitch between the mesentery of the Roux limb and the transverse mesocolon was an independent predictor for IH (B = 1.727, P = .025). No technical or consequential errors could be identified as responsible for RC.
CONCLUSION: The observational clinical human reliability analysis is a useful method to identify operative failure. For retrocolic, retrogastric laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, a systematic approach for the closure of the transverse mesenteric window might prevent IH complications.
METHODS: An observational clinical human reliability assessment approach was used to analyze the operating videos of 3 groups: an IH group (n = 12), a Roux compression group (n = 13), and a control group (no complications, n = 21). Two investigators, unaware of the outcomes, reviewed all videos, using special rating software. All errors were categorized using the external error mode system and further described if a direct consequential error (e.g., bleeding) was found.
RESULTS: An analysis of data showed that, on average, more errors occurred in the complication groups than in the control group (IH 5.85, Roux compression 3.54, control .90, P < .001). The strongest differences were found for missing intermesenteric stitches on both sides of the Roux limb. Logistic regression analysis showed that a missed stitch between the mesentery of the Roux limb and the transverse mesocolon was an independent predictor for IH (B = 1.727, P = .025). No technical or consequential errors could be identified as responsible for RC.
CONCLUSION: The observational clinical human reliability analysis is a useful method to identify operative failure. For retrocolic, retrogastric laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, a systematic approach for the closure of the transverse mesenteric window might prevent IH complications.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app