We have located links that may give you full text access.
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone for locally advanced cervical cancer in elderly women.
Tumori 2010 November
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stage IB2-IVA).
METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 105 women aged 265 years who received radiotherapy (group I, n=61) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (group II, n=44). Patients received a median dose of 76.4 Gy to point A, including 30-35 Gy of high-dose intracavity brachytherapy. The concurrent chemoradiotherapy group received platinum-based chemotherapy.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 65 months for surviving patients. There was no significant difference in compliance to radiotherapy between the two groups. Most acute toxicities were hematologic; acute hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity were significantly more common in group II. Five-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates were, respectively, 53.5% and 66.6% in group I and 61.8% and 68.8% in group II. Performance status, comorbidity index, tumor size, and stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas stage was the only prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The analysis showed no benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with respect to overall survival and cancer-specific survival in elderly women. A prospective study is needed to determine the role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in this population.
METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 105 women aged 265 years who received radiotherapy (group I, n=61) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (group II, n=44). Patients received a median dose of 76.4 Gy to point A, including 30-35 Gy of high-dose intracavity brachytherapy. The concurrent chemoradiotherapy group received platinum-based chemotherapy.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 65 months for surviving patients. There was no significant difference in compliance to radiotherapy between the two groups. Most acute toxicities were hematologic; acute hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity were significantly more common in group II. Five-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates were, respectively, 53.5% and 66.6% in group I and 61.8% and 68.8% in group II. Performance status, comorbidity index, tumor size, and stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas stage was the only prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The analysis showed no benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with respect to overall survival and cancer-specific survival in elderly women. A prospective study is needed to determine the role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in this population.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app