JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Site-specific differences in bone mineral density in black and white premenopausal South African women.

SUMMARY: We examined ethnic differences in bone mineral density (BMD) and the contribution of body composition, lifestyle and socioeconomic factors in South African women. Femoral neck and total hip BMD were higher, but lumbar spine BMD was lower in black women, with body composition, lifestyle and socioeconomic status (SES) factors contributing differently in ethnic groups.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data on the relative contribution of body composition, lifestyle factors and SES, unique to different ethnic groups in South Africa, to BMD. We examined differences in femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH) and lumbar spine (LS) BMD between black and white premenopausal South African women and the associations between BMD and body composition, lifestyle factors and SES in these two ethnic groups.

METHODS: BMD and body composition were measured in 240 black (27 ± 7; 18-45 years) and 187 white (31 ± 8; 18-45 years) women using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Questionnaires were administered to examine SES, physical activity and dietary intake.

RESULTS: After co-varying for age, FN and TH were higher in black than white women (FN 0.882 ± 0.128 vs. 0.827 ± 0.116 g/cm(2), P < 0.001; TH 0.970 ± 0.130 vs. 0.943 ± 0.124 g/cm(2), P = 0.018). When adjusting for ethnic differences in body composition, LS was higher in white than black women. In black women, fat-free soft tissue mass, SES and injectable contraceptive use explained 33-42% of the variance in BMD at the hip sites and 22% at the LS. In white women, fat-free soft tissue mass and leisure activity explained 24-30% of the variance in BMD at the hip sites, whereas fat mass, leisure activity and oral contraceptive use explained 11% of the variance at the LS.

CONCLUSION: FN and TH BMD were higher, but LS BMD was lower in black than white South African women with body composition, lifestyle and SES factors contributing differently to BMD in these women.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app