We have located links that may give you full text access.
A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of indeterminate renal masses.
Nuclear Medicine Communications 2011 April
PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computerized tomography (CT; F-18 FDG-PET/CT) in the detection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with indeterminate renal masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2008 and June 2010, 18 patients with suspicious primary renal masses detected by conventional imaging underwent FDG PET/CT imaging. All patients underwent nephrectomy or surgical resection of the renal mass and the final diagnoses were based on histopathology.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients had RCC (14 clear-cell RCC, one papillary RCC). Three renal tumors were benign, corresponding to two renal cortical cysts and one oncocytoma. FDG PET/CT accurately detected seven malignant lesions and yielded false-negative results in eight patients. FDG PET/CT was true negative in two patients with a renal cortical cyst and false positive in a patient with oncocytoma. PET showed a sensitivity of 46.6%, specificity of 66.6%, and accuracy of 50% for primary RCC tumors. The median size of visualized tumors was greater than the median size of nonvisualized tumors, and the average Fuhrman grade of the patients with FDG-positive malignant lesions were higher than that of the patients with FDG-negative lesions. In malignant tumors, the change between early and delayed imaging for average standardized uptake values and maximum SUVs were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT is not a reliable modality in the diagnosis of RCC with its low sensitivity, but it is effective in the detection of distant metastases and can be used as a complementary tool when conventional imaging studies yield equivocal results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2008 and June 2010, 18 patients with suspicious primary renal masses detected by conventional imaging underwent FDG PET/CT imaging. All patients underwent nephrectomy or surgical resection of the renal mass and the final diagnoses were based on histopathology.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients had RCC (14 clear-cell RCC, one papillary RCC). Three renal tumors were benign, corresponding to two renal cortical cysts and one oncocytoma. FDG PET/CT accurately detected seven malignant lesions and yielded false-negative results in eight patients. FDG PET/CT was true negative in two patients with a renal cortical cyst and false positive in a patient with oncocytoma. PET showed a sensitivity of 46.6%, specificity of 66.6%, and accuracy of 50% for primary RCC tumors. The median size of visualized tumors was greater than the median size of nonvisualized tumors, and the average Fuhrman grade of the patients with FDG-positive malignant lesions were higher than that of the patients with FDG-negative lesions. In malignant tumors, the change between early and delayed imaging for average standardized uptake values and maximum SUVs were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT is not a reliable modality in the diagnosis of RCC with its low sensitivity, but it is effective in the detection of distant metastases and can be used as a complementary tool when conventional imaging studies yield equivocal results.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app