JOURNAL ARTICLE

Outcome of infra-inguinal bypass grafts using vein conduit with less than 3 millimeters diameter in critical leg ischemia

Hani Slim, Alok Tiwari, Jens Carsten Ritter, Hisham Rashid
Journal of Vascular Surgery 2011, 53 (2): 421-5
21146343

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in amputation-free survival and patency rates of infra-inguinal bypass grafts in patients with critical leg ischemia (CLI) with vein conduits with an internal diameter <3 mm compared to those with vein conduits with a diameter of ≥ 3 mm.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with CLI undergoing infra-inguinal bypass. Preoperative duplex scan mapping and measurement of potential vein grafts were performed on all patients. Patients were recruited in a 1-year duplex scan graft surveillance program. Primary end points were amputation-free survival and patency rates at 1 year postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier and χ(2) test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: Between January 2004 and April 2010, 157 consecutive patients with CLI underwent 171 bypasses using vein conduits (111 men, 46 women; median age, 75 years; range, 45-96 years). Ninety-three bypasses (54.4%) were performed for tissue loss, 44 (25.7%) for gangrene, and for rest pain. Of the 157 patients, 113 (72.0%) had diabetes mellitus, 40 (25.5%) had renal impairment, 131 (83.4%) had hypertension, and 64 (40.8%) had ischemic heart disease. Femoro-popliteal bypass was performed in 38 cases (22.2%), whereas 133 (77.8%) of the bypasses were femoro-distal. Autogenous great saphenous vein (GSV) was used in all cases. All grafts were reversed. The diameter of 31 (18%) vein conduits measured <3 mm (range, 2-2.9 mm) on preoperative duplex scan. One hundred thirty-four grafts had at least 1-year follow-up. The primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates at 1 year for vein conduits <3 mm were 51.2%, 82.6%, and 82.6%, respectively, compared to 68.4%, 93.3%, and 95.2%, respectively, in the ≥ 3 mm group. This was only significant for the secondary patency (P = .0392). The amputation-free survival at 48 months was 70.8% for vein conduits <3 mm and 57.3 for vein conduits ≥ 3 mm.

CONCLUSION: This series has shown that primary and assisted primary patency rates in small veins are not significantly different at 1 year but the secondary patency rates are better in the larger veins. Similarly, the amputation-free survival was also comparable. The authors would, therefore, advocate the use of small veins >2 mm in diameter in patients with CLI. Duplex scan surveillance followed by early salvage angioplasty for threatened grafts is needed to achieve good patency rates in both groups.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
21146343
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"