We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Risk factors for fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in adults with community-onset febrile urinary tract infection.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2011 March
OBJECTIVES: To assess risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in community-onset febrile Escherichia coli urinary tract infection (UTI).
METHODS: A nested case-control study within a cohort of consecutive adults with febrile UTI presenting at primary healthcare centres or emergency departments during January 2004 through December 2009. Resistance was defined using EUCAST criteria (ciprofloxacin MIC >1.0 mg/L). Cases were subjects with fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli, and controls those with fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance.
RESULTS: Of 787 consecutive patients, 420 had E. coli-positive urine cultures. Of these, 51 (12%) were fluoroquinolone resistant. Independent risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance were urinary catheter [odds ratio (OR) 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-11.6], recent hospitalization (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.0-4.3) and fluoroquinolone use in the past 6 months (OR 17.5; 95% CI 6.0-50.7). Environmental factors (e.g. contact with animals or hospitalized household members) were not associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains, 33% were resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate and 65% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; 14% were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) positive compared with <1% of fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: Recent hospitalization, urinary catheter and fluoroquinolone use in the past 6 months were independent risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in community-onset febrile E. coli UTI. Contact with animals or hospitalized household members was not associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Fluoroquinolone resistance may be a marker of broader resistance, including ESBL positivity.
METHODS: A nested case-control study within a cohort of consecutive adults with febrile UTI presenting at primary healthcare centres or emergency departments during January 2004 through December 2009. Resistance was defined using EUCAST criteria (ciprofloxacin MIC >1.0 mg/L). Cases were subjects with fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli, and controls those with fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance.
RESULTS: Of 787 consecutive patients, 420 had E. coli-positive urine cultures. Of these, 51 (12%) were fluoroquinolone resistant. Independent risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance were urinary catheter [odds ratio (OR) 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-11.6], recent hospitalization (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.0-4.3) and fluoroquinolone use in the past 6 months (OR 17.5; 95% CI 6.0-50.7). Environmental factors (e.g. contact with animals or hospitalized household members) were not associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains, 33% were resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate and 65% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; 14% were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) positive compared with <1% of fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: Recent hospitalization, urinary catheter and fluoroquinolone use in the past 6 months were independent risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in community-onset febrile E. coli UTI. Contact with animals or hospitalized household members was not associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Fluoroquinolone resistance may be a marker of broader resistance, including ESBL positivity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app