We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Scintigraphic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses of bovine bone mineral and autogenous bone mixture in sinus floor augmentation: a randomized controlled trial--results after 4 months of healing.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2011 January
PURPOSE: To test our null hypothesis stating that the mixture of autogenous cortical bone scrapings and bovine bone mineral (BBM) in a ratio of 1:4, compared with BBM alone, would have no significant effect on new bone formation 4 months after maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients presenting with alveolar bone height of less than 5 mm in the narrowest zone between the sinus floor and alveolar crest were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups in this randomized controlled trial. We augmented 12 maxillary sinuses with a mixture of BBM and cortical autogenous bone graft, which was collected from the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus by a bone scraper, and 12 maxillary sinuses with BBM alone. Four months postoperatively, new bone formation in the augmented sinus sites was evaluated through bone scintigraphy, as well as histologic and histomorphometric analyses of the biopsy specimens obtained during implant placement. Data were statistically analyzed by independent-samples t test.
RESULTS: Scintigraphically detectable new bone formation did not differ significantly between the groups (P > .05). Histologic findings showed that the new bone bridged between BBM particles and BBM underwent resorption by osteoclasts with or without the addition of autogenous bone graft. According to histomorphometric findings, the difference between the percentages of newly formed bone in the sinuses augmented with graft mixture (25.73%) and BBM alone (24.19%) was statistically nonsignificant (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of autogenous cortical bone scrapings to BBM in a ratio of 1:4, compared with BBM alone, does not markedly increase new bone formation 4 months after maxillary sinus lifting.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients presenting with alveolar bone height of less than 5 mm in the narrowest zone between the sinus floor and alveolar crest were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups in this randomized controlled trial. We augmented 12 maxillary sinuses with a mixture of BBM and cortical autogenous bone graft, which was collected from the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus by a bone scraper, and 12 maxillary sinuses with BBM alone. Four months postoperatively, new bone formation in the augmented sinus sites was evaluated through bone scintigraphy, as well as histologic and histomorphometric analyses of the biopsy specimens obtained during implant placement. Data were statistically analyzed by independent-samples t test.
RESULTS: Scintigraphically detectable new bone formation did not differ significantly between the groups (P > .05). Histologic findings showed that the new bone bridged between BBM particles and BBM underwent resorption by osteoclasts with or without the addition of autogenous bone graft. According to histomorphometric findings, the difference between the percentages of newly formed bone in the sinuses augmented with graft mixture (25.73%) and BBM alone (24.19%) was statistically nonsignificant (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of autogenous cortical bone scrapings to BBM in a ratio of 1:4, compared with BBM alone, does not markedly increase new bone formation 4 months after maxillary sinus lifting.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app