Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Cystic fibrosis and endoscopic sinus surgery: Relationship between nasal polyposis and likelihood of revision endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: To observe the extent of nasal polyposis endoscopically in a cystic fibrosis population before the first surgical intervention and to grade the extent using a modified Malm scale, to observe patients prospectively and record the need for revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), and to compare this among the individual polyp grading groupings.

DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review of data collected prospectively.

SETTING: Tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients with a clinical preoperative diagnosis of cystic fibrosis and sinusitis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using a modified Malm scale, the extent of polyps was prospectively graded into 3 groups before the first surgical intervention. The number of patients needing revision ESS and the mean time to revision ESS were compared among the 3 groups.

RESULTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients underwent ESS between 1992 and 2007. We used a 3-stage system for extent of polyposis: 16 patients were noted to have no polyps (grade A), 14 had mild polyposis (grade B), and 19 had extensive polyposis (grade C). During the study, 14 patients required revision surgery: 3 with mild polyps and 11 with extensive polyps. Mean time to revision surgery was 39.7 months for those with grade B and 23.8 months for those with grade C. In the overall statistical analysis, the rate of revision ESS was significantly different among the 3 groups (P < .001). In pairwise comparisons, there were significant differences between those with grades A and C (P < .001) and between those with grades B and C (P = .04) and a trend toward significance between those with grades A and B (P = .052). There were no complications from ESS.

CONCLUSION: Preoperative grading of nasal polyposis in patients with cystic fibrosis can help assess the future likelihood of revision ESS.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app