Comparative Study
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Phylogeny and identification of Nocardia species on the basis of multilocus sequence analysis.

Nocardia species identification is difficult due to a complex and rapidly changing taxonomy, the failure of 16S rRNA and cellular fatty acid analysis to discriminate many species, and the unreliability of biochemical testing. Here, Nocardia species identification was achieved through multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) of gyrase B of the β subunit of DNA topoisomerase (gyrB), 16S rRNA (16S), subunit A of SecA preprotein translocase (secA1), the 65-kDa heat shock protein (hsp65), and RNA polymerase (rpoB) applied to 190 clinical, 36 type, and 11 reference strains. Phylogenetic analysis resolved 30 sequence clusters with high (>85%) bootstrap support. Since most clusters contained a single type strain and the analysis corroborated current knowledge of Nocardia taxonomy, the sequence clusters were equated with species clusters and MLSA was deemed appropriate for species identification. By comparison, single-locus analysis was inadequate because it failed to resolve species clusters, partly due to the presence of foreign alleles in 22.1% of isolates. While MLSA identified the species of the majority (71.3%) of strains, it also identified clusters that may correspond to new species. The correlation of the identities by MLSA with those determined on the basis of microscopic examination, biochemical testing, and fatty acid analysis was 95%; however, MLSA was more discriminatory. Nocardia cyriacigeorgica (21.58%) and N. farcinica (14.74%) were the most frequently encountered species among clinical isolates. In summary, five-locus MLSA is a reliable method of elucidating taxonomic data to inform Nocardia species identification; however, three-locus (gyrB-16S-secA1) or four-locus (gyrB-16S-secA1-hsp65) MLSA was nearly as reliable, correctly identifying 98.5% and 99.5% of isolates, respectively, and would be more feasible for routine use in a clinical reference microbiology laboratory.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app