We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, N.I.H., EXTRAMURAL
Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
Journal of Trauma 2010 August
BACKGROUND: Hybrid plating (HP) may improve fixation strength of locked plating (LP) constructs by combining the use of locked and nonlocked screws within a bone segment. This biomechanical study evaluated whether a hybrid bridge plating construct provides greater fixation strength than an all-locked construct in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
METHODS: LP and HP constructs were applied to a validated surrogate of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis in a bridge plating configuration. In LP constructs, plates were applied with three locking screws on each side of the fracture gap and remained 1 mm elevated. In HP constructs, plates were applied with two conventional screws complemented by a single locked screw on each side of the fracture. Constructs were tested under dynamic loading to failure in bending, torsion, and axial loading to analyze construct strength and failure mechanism in each loading mode.
RESULTS: Compared with the LP construct, the HP construct was 7% stronger in bending (p = 0.17), 42% stronger in torsion (p < 0.001), and 7% weaker in axial compression (p = 0.003). In bending, constructs failed by periprosthetic fracture. In torsion, LP constructs failed by screw breakage, and HP constructs failed by periprosthetic fracture or breakage of the locking screw. In axial compression, all constructs failed by screw migration.
CONCLUSIONS: HP delivered similar bending strength and higher torsional strength than an all-locked bridge plating construct, while causing only a small decrease in axial strength. It may therefore provide an attractive alternative to an all-locked construct for plate fixation in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
METHODS: LP and HP constructs were applied to a validated surrogate of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis in a bridge plating configuration. In LP constructs, plates were applied with three locking screws on each side of the fracture gap and remained 1 mm elevated. In HP constructs, plates were applied with two conventional screws complemented by a single locked screw on each side of the fracture. Constructs were tested under dynamic loading to failure in bending, torsion, and axial loading to analyze construct strength and failure mechanism in each loading mode.
RESULTS: Compared with the LP construct, the HP construct was 7% stronger in bending (p = 0.17), 42% stronger in torsion (p < 0.001), and 7% weaker in axial compression (p = 0.003). In bending, constructs failed by periprosthetic fracture. In torsion, LP constructs failed by screw breakage, and HP constructs failed by periprosthetic fracture or breakage of the locking screw. In axial compression, all constructs failed by screw migration.
CONCLUSIONS: HP delivered similar bending strength and higher torsional strength than an all-locked bridge plating construct, while causing only a small decrease in axial strength. It may therefore provide an attractive alternative to an all-locked construct for plate fixation in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app