We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Pulsed radiofrequency versus conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in painful shoulder: a prospective, randomized study.
Clinical Rehabilitation 2010 November
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of pulse radiofrequency applied to the suprascapular nerve with the efficacy of conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment in patients with shoulder pain.
DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: An outpatient physical therapy and rehabilitation clinic.
SUBJECTS: Forty patients with shoulder pain lasting at least three months were included in the study. Subjects were randomly allocated into either a pulsed radiofrequency treatment or a conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment. All patients received exercise therapy.
MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Outcome measurements were performed using the visual analogue scale for pain and range of motion; the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was used for disability; and the Short Form-36 was used to establish quality of life. All of the measurements were assessed at four points in time (before the intervention, and for 1, 4 and 12 weeks afterwards).
RESULTS: When the groups were compared, no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of visual analogue scale, range of motion, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (except for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index total score), Short Form-36 subscores, and paracetamol consumption for all weeks (P >0.05).
CONCLUSION: Our results showed that there is no difference in effect between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and pulsed radiofrequency treatment for shoulder pain.
DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: An outpatient physical therapy and rehabilitation clinic.
SUBJECTS: Forty patients with shoulder pain lasting at least three months were included in the study. Subjects were randomly allocated into either a pulsed radiofrequency treatment or a conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment. All patients received exercise therapy.
MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Outcome measurements were performed using the visual analogue scale for pain and range of motion; the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index was used for disability; and the Short Form-36 was used to establish quality of life. All of the measurements were assessed at four points in time (before the intervention, and for 1, 4 and 12 weeks afterwards).
RESULTS: When the groups were compared, no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of visual analogue scale, range of motion, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (except for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index total score), Short Form-36 subscores, and paracetamol consumption for all weeks (P >0.05).
CONCLUSION: Our results showed that there is no difference in effect between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and pulsed radiofrequency treatment for shoulder pain.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app