CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
VALIDATION STUDIES
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Underestimation of duration of ventricular activation by 12-lead ECG compared with direct measurement of activation duration derived from implanted pacemaker leads.

AIM: To determine extent to which 12-lead ECG QRS duration (QRSd) reflects ventricular activation duration compared with time relations from unpaced ventricular myograms in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) patients.

METHODS: Left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) myograms were recorded during spontaneous rhythm from in-situ pacemaker leads in 77 patients receiving CRT; 14 'normal activation' (unpaced QRSd <12 ms), 10 'simple left bundle branch block' (LBBB, QRSd 120-149 ms), 40 'advanced LBBB' (QRS ≥ 150 ms) and 13 right bundle branch block. Delay in onset (Q-LV, Q-RV) and duration (dur-LV, dur-RV) of activation were measured. Interventricular delay (ΔT: Q-LV minus Q-RV) and 'LV-overrun' (time between end 12-lead QRS and Q-end LV myogram) were calculated.

RESULTS: 'Normal activation': Neither Q-LV, Q-RV (38 ± 6 ms, 39 ± 11 ms), nor dur-LV, dur-RV (66 ± 9 ms, 81 ± 25 ms) differed. ΔT (-1 ± 11 ms) was not different from zero, nor was Q-end LV (104 ± 10 ms) different from QRSd (p=0.09). 'Simple LBBB': Q-LV (102 ± 28 ms) was longer than 'normal activation' (p<0.001), but Q-RV, dur-LV, and dur-RV were no different. ΔT (54 ± 23 ms) was increased (p<0.001) and Q-end LV (187 ± 48 ms) was longer than QRSd (p=0.005). 'Advanced LBBB': Q-LV (115 ± 52 ms) was longer than 'normal activation' (p<0.001) but Q-RV was no different, so ΔT (72 ± 47 ms) was increased (p<0.001 compared to normal, p=0.04 compared to simple LBBB). Dur-LV (102 ± 27 ms) was also prolonged, so Q-end LV (218 ± 48 ms) was longer than QRSd (p<0.001). Longer LV-overrun was associated with longer ΔT (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged LV myopotential duration, associated with interventricular delay, is electrically silent on 12-lead QRSd. Unpaced surface QRSd underestimates true duration of native LV activation in CRT patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app