Initial nonadherence, primary failure and therapeutic success of metformin monotherapy in clinical practice

Gregory A Nichols, Christopher Conner, Jonathan B Brown
Current Medical Research and Opinion 2010, 26 (9): 2127-35

OBJECTIVE: To document the extent to which drug naïve patients with diabetes continued newly initiated metformin monotherapy, and who subsequently experienced primary failure or therapeutic success.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using an observational longitudinal cohort design, we identified all 3116 type 2 diabetes patients who initiated metformin monotherapy as their first-ever anti-hyperglycemic drug in 2004-2006. We defined initial nonadherence as having occurred in the first 6 months if a patient (1) received only a single metformin dispense, (2) received less than a 90 day supply, or (3) switched to a second anti-hyperglycemic agent. Among those patients who continued metformin monotherapy for at least 6 months, we determined the proportion attaining A1C < 7% by examining A1Cs recorded prior to adding a second anti-hyperglycemic agent or December 31, 2008, whichever occurred first. We identified factors associated with achieving A1C < 7% with logistic regression.

RESULTS: Initial nonadherence occurred in 518 (16.6%) of the 3116 patients studied. Of those who continued metformin for at least 6 months, a majority (71.7% overall) achieved an A1C < 7%, even when pre-metformin A1C was high (59.6% among those with A1C > 9%). Initiating metformin within 3 months of diagnosis increased the probability of success nearly three-fold compared to initiating after 12-23 months (OR 2.85, 95% CI 2.04-3.98). Independent of duration, lower A1C at initiation increased the probability of success.

CONCLUSIONS: Initiating metformin immediately at diagnosis and while A1C is still low substantially increases the probability of attaining glycemic success. Our findings support the current guidelines recommending metformin therapy as soon as type 2 diabetes is diagnosed. This study was limited by its observational design, the inability to assess reasons for metformin nonadherence, and the highly automated study setting.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article


You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.


Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"