Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Validity and reliability of the Turkish Self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaire.

Pain Medicine 2010 July
OBJECTIVE: The Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) is a 7-item self-report scale developed to identify pain of predominantly neuropathic origin. The aim of this study was to develop a Turkish version of the S-LANSS and to test its validity and reliability in chronic pain patients.

METHOD AND PATIENTS: We enrolled 244 chronic pain patients treated at the Neurology Department. The original version of the S-LANSS was translated into Turkish by standard procedures. An independent clinician determined the pain type (neuropathic vs nociceptive). The reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (agreement with the reference diagnosis and sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) were determined.

RESULTS: Two-hundred and forty-four patients with chronic pain (167 women, 43.1 +/- 11.4 years), 137, neuropathic pain and 107, nociceptive pain, were asked to complete the S-LANSS twice. Cronbach's alpha-coefficient was 0.74 for the test and 0.73 for the retest. Total S-LANSS scores for subjects did not significantly differ between applications (P = 0.46). Correlation coefficient was r: 0.97 (P < 0.01), which is fairly high for a self-assessment tool. Compared with the clinical assessment, the sensitivity and specificity of the S-LANSS were 72.3% (95% CI, 64.0-79.6%) and 80.4% (95% CI, 71.6-87.4%), respectively, for both the test and retest. The sensitivity and specificity of the Turkish S-LANSS were similar to those determined in the original validation study.

CONCLUSION: This study reports the first validation of a translated version of the S-LANNS into another language. The results suggest that the Turkish version of S-LANSS is a reliable and valid differential diagnostic measure of neuropathic pain in chronic pain patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app