We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Non-invasive assessment of pulmonary blood flow using an inert gas rebreathing device in fibrotic lung disease.
Thorax 2010 April
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is increasingly recognised in patients with diffuse lung disease, and is associated with increased mortality. Cardiac output (CO) is a prognostic marker in PH. Non-invasive assessment of pulmonary blood flow (PBF(INNOCOR)) with the inert gas rebreathing Innocor device has been validated against CO in PH, but not in PH associated with parenchymal lung disease. PBF(INNOCOR) may be less accurate in patients with lung disease because of intrapulmonary shunting and/or incomplete gas mixing. Our aim was to determine the variability of PBF(INNOCOR) in normal subjects, before evaluating PBF(INNOCOR) in diffuse lung disease against CO measured by the indirect Fick method (CO(FICK)) at right heart catheterisation (RHC).
METHODS AND RESULTS: 23 normal subjects had lung volume measurements by a constant-volume body plethysmograph and three consecutive PBF(INNOCOR) measurements on the same day. 20 subjects returned for repeat assessment. PBF(INNOCOR) had good intrasession repeatability (coefficient of variation (CV)=6.57%) and intersession reproducibility (mean CO difference=0.13; single determinant SD=0.49; CV=9.7%). 28 consecutive patients with lung fibrosis referred for RHC had PBF(INNOCOR) measured within 24 h of RHC. There was good agreement between CO(FICK) and PBF(INNOCOR), with no evidence of systematic bias (mean CO(FICK) 4.3+/-1.0; PBF(INNOCOR) 4.0+/-1.2l/ min; p=0.07). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of -0.32 and limits of agreement of -2.10 to +1.45.
CONCLUSION: Non-invasive PBF measured by the inert gas rebreathing Innocor device has good intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility. In diffuse lung disease, CO can be accurately and non-invasively measured by the Innocor device.
METHODS AND RESULTS: 23 normal subjects had lung volume measurements by a constant-volume body plethysmograph and three consecutive PBF(INNOCOR) measurements on the same day. 20 subjects returned for repeat assessment. PBF(INNOCOR) had good intrasession repeatability (coefficient of variation (CV)=6.57%) and intersession reproducibility (mean CO difference=0.13; single determinant SD=0.49; CV=9.7%). 28 consecutive patients with lung fibrosis referred for RHC had PBF(INNOCOR) measured within 24 h of RHC. There was good agreement between CO(FICK) and PBF(INNOCOR), with no evidence of systematic bias (mean CO(FICK) 4.3+/-1.0; PBF(INNOCOR) 4.0+/-1.2l/ min; p=0.07). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of -0.32 and limits of agreement of -2.10 to +1.45.
CONCLUSION: Non-invasive PBF measured by the inert gas rebreathing Innocor device has good intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility. In diffuse lung disease, CO can be accurately and non-invasively measured by the Innocor device.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app