We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Retrospective study from Harare Central Maternity Hospital comparing symphysiotomies with Caesarean Sections for similar indications.
Central African Journal of Medicine 2006 July
OBJECTIVE: To explore the possibility that in obstructed labour with a live baby, a delivery by symphysiotomy is an ethical option.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Teaching hospital with busy maternity wards.
SUBJECTS: Women in (nearly) second stage obstructed labour who were either delivered by Caesarean Section (79), or symphysiotomy, (172).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparing perinatal mortality and morbidity and maternal complications, pain, long term morbidity and subsequent reproductive behaviour.
RESULTS: There is no evidence of more foetal mortality or morbidity after a symphysiotomy. Short term maternal morbidity is more serious after Caesarean Section. Long term maternal morbidity might be increased after symphysiotomies, compared with Caesarean Section. Because there are more repeat operative deliveries and trials of scar after a Caesarean Section, future maternal, foetal and infant mortality is higher.
CONCLUSION: Rejection of symphysiotomies as an option for delivery in cases of obstructed labour is not evidence based. It is very likely that lives could be saved if symphysiotomies were taught in the sub-Saharan teaching hospitals and practiced in the district hospitals. Those who oppose symphysiotomies should provide the relevant data.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Teaching hospital with busy maternity wards.
SUBJECTS: Women in (nearly) second stage obstructed labour who were either delivered by Caesarean Section (79), or symphysiotomy, (172).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparing perinatal mortality and morbidity and maternal complications, pain, long term morbidity and subsequent reproductive behaviour.
RESULTS: There is no evidence of more foetal mortality or morbidity after a symphysiotomy. Short term maternal morbidity is more serious after Caesarean Section. Long term maternal morbidity might be increased after symphysiotomies, compared with Caesarean Section. Because there are more repeat operative deliveries and trials of scar after a Caesarean Section, future maternal, foetal and infant mortality is higher.
CONCLUSION: Rejection of symphysiotomies as an option for delivery in cases of obstructed labour is not evidence based. It is very likely that lives could be saved if symphysiotomies were taught in the sub-Saharan teaching hospitals and practiced in the district hospitals. Those who oppose symphysiotomies should provide the relevant data.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app