Comparative Study
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A comparison of fracture reductions performed by physician extenders and orthopaedic residents in the acute pediatric orthopaedic practice.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-mandated 80-hour work week has led many teaching hospitals to find adequate replacements for residents. In addition, the subspecialty of pediatric orthopaedics is currently experiencing a workforce shortage. At the authors' institution, Level I emergency department and hospital on-call duties alternate between orthopaedic residents and orthopaedic-specific nurse practitioners. There are no studies looking at the quality of care rendered in the pediatric orthopaedic setting by physician extenders.

METHODS: A consecutive series of 139 pediatric patients with the diagnosis of closed both-bones diaphyseal forearm fracture underwent closed reduction and casting by either a trained nurse practitioner or orthopaedic resident in the emergency department from July 2006 through June 2007. Fifty-seven (41%) patients were treated by a nurse practitioner and 82 (59%) patients were treated by an orthopaedic resident. All patients were followed to completion of treatment by fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic staff.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in regard to the use of conscious sedation, cast characteristics, fracture characteristics, or length of follow up (P > 0.05). Patients treated by orthopaedic residents required more minor interventions (48% versus 35%), but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.17). However, patients treated by orthopaedic residents had a higher rate of requiring premedication and molding of a new cast in clinic for loss of reduction (33% versus 18%), and this did approach statistical significance (P = 0.052). In addition, patients treated by orthopaedic residents had slightly more major interventions, which necessitated operative intervention to restore alignment of the fracture (11% versus 8%), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with closed both-bones diaphyseal forearm fractures were treated successfully by both trained orthopaedic nurse practitioners and orthopaedic residents with no statistically significant difference in interventions.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app