Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Riluzole in cerebellar ataxia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial.

Neurology 2010 March 10
BACKGROUND: The pleiotropic effects of riluzole may antagonize common mechanisms underlying chronic cerebellar ataxia, a debilitating and untreatable consequence of various diseases.

METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial, 40 patients presenting with cerebellar ataxias of different etiologies were randomly assigned to riluzole (100 mg/day) or placebo for 8 weeks. The following outcome measures were compared: proportion of patients with a decrease of at least 5 points in the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) total score after 4 and 8 weeks compared with the baseline score; mean changes from the baseline to posttreatment ICARS (total score and subscores at 8 weeks); and occurrence of adverse events.

RESULTS: Riluzole and placebo groups did not differ in baseline characteristics. The number of patients with a 5-point ICARS drop was significantly higher in the riluzole group than in the placebo group after 4 weeks (9/19 vs 1/19; odds ratio [OR] = 16.2; 95% confidence interval [CI ] 1.8-147.1) and 8 weeks (13/19 vs 1/19; OR = 39.0; 95% CI 4.2-364.2). The mean change in the riluzole group ICARS after treatment revealed a decrease (p < 0.001) in the total score (-7.05 [4.96] vs 0.16 [2.65]) and major subscores (-2.11 [2.75] vs 0.68 [1.94] for static function, -4.11 [2.96] vs 0.37 [2.0] for kinetic function, and -0.74 [0.81] vs 0.05 [0.40] for dysarthria). Sporadic, mild adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the potential effectiveness of riluzole as symptomatic therapy in diverse forms of cerebellar ataxia.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that riluzole reduces, by at least 5 points, the ICARS score in patients with a wide range of disorders that cause cerebellar ataxia (risk difference 63.2%, 95% CI 33.5%-79.9%).

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app