EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Multicenter evaluation of the first automated Elecsys sFlt-1 and PlGF assays in normal pregnancies and preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVES: Performance evaluation of Elecsys sFlt-1 and PlGF assays.

DESIGN AND METHODS: Within-, between-run, total imprecision, functional sensitivity, inter-laboratory comparison, method comparison and lot-to-lot reproducibility were evaluated.

RESULTS: Within- and between-run CVs were below 4% for sFlt-1 >60 and PlGF > 20 pg/mL. Total imprecision CVs were below 4.3%. Functional sensitivity was < 5 pg/mL. Inter-laboratory CVs were <5%. Elecsys correlated well with Quantikine VEGF-R1 (r=0.960) and PlGF (r=0.968). Lot-to-lot comparisons yielded highly correlated results (r>0.999). In healthy pregnancies, the median levels of sFlt-1 remained constant in first (1107 pg/mL) and second trimesters (1437 pg/mL) but increased in the third trimester (2395 pg/mL), while median PlGF levels increased in the first (30 pg/mL) and second trimesters (279 pg/mL) and peaked at 29 to 32 weeks (626 pg/mL) and decreased thereafter (340 pg/mL). The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is highest in the first trimester (median: 28) but remained constant in the second (median: 4.7) and third trimesters (median: 5.1). In PE/HELPP samples matched for gestational age the sFlt-1 levels were significantly higher (6894-34,624 pg/mL), whereas PlGF levels were lower (9.2-80 pg/mL) and the median sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is much higher (461; range: 121-2614) than in apparently healthy pregnancies (3.6; range: 0.3-105).

CONCLUSION: The new Roche Elecsys sFlt-1 and PlGF immunoassay showed excellent precision and reliability. There was a clear difference in the Elecsys sFlt-1/PlGF ratio between samples obtained from women with apparently normal pregnancy at the time of blood collection and those diagnosed with PE/HELLP at the same age of gestation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app