COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock

Daniel De Backer, Patrick Biston, Jacques Devriendt, Christian Madl, Didier Chochrad, Cesar Aldecoa, Alexandre Brasseur, Pierre Defrance, Philippe Gottignies, Jean-Louis Vincent
New England Journal of Medicine 2010 March 4, 362 (9): 779-89
20200382

BACKGROUND: Both dopamine and norepinephrine are recommended as first-line vasopressor agents in the treatment of shock. There is a continuing controversy about whether one agent is superior to the other.

METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned patients with shock to receive either dopamine or norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor therapy to restore and maintain blood pressure. When blood pressure could not be maintained with a dose of 20 microg per kilogram of body weight per minute for dopamine or a dose of 0.19 microg per kilogram per minute for norepinephrine, open-label norepinephrine, epinephrine, or vasopressin could be added. The primary outcome was the rate of death at 28 days after randomization; secondary end points included the number of days without need for organ support and the occurrence of adverse events.

RESULTS: The trial included 1679 patients, of whom 858 were assigned to dopamine and 821 to norepinephrine. The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. There was no significant between-group difference in the rate of death at 28 days (52.5% in the dopamine group and 48.5% in the norepinephrine group; odds ratio with dopamine, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.42; P=0.10). However, there were more arrhythmic events among the patients treated with dopamine than among those treated with norepinephrine (207 events [24.1%] vs. 102 events [12.4%], P<0.001). A subgroup analysis showed that dopamine, as compared with norepinephrine, was associated with an increased rate of death at 28 days among the 280 patients with cardiogenic shock but not among the 1044 patients with septic shock or the 263 with hypovolemic shock (P=0.03 for cardiogenic shock, P=0.19 for septic shock, and P=0.84 for hypovolemic shock, in Kaplan-Meier analyses).

CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no significant difference in the rate of death between patients with shock who were treated with dopamine as the first-line vasopressor agent and those who were treated with norepinephrine, the use of dopamine was associated with a greater number of adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00314704.)

Full Text Links

We have located open access full text paper links.

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Responses

Sort by: Most RecentHighest Rated

bhuvanesh mahendran

Amazing paper... Must read for every resident.

44

Dr. Bijay Sah

Excellent paper. What inotropic agent is preferred in shock with severe PAH ?

12

tiago gil

What should we do, follow American heart in use of dopamine or this excellent review and use norepinephrine ?

11

Adam Bialas

Excellent paper. Very important and interesting.

9

Ying Han

renal dysfunction and non-cardiogenic shock ----dopamine is preferable.
Cardiogenic shock ----norepinephrine

6

Shoaib Saadat

Since conclusive evidence regarding epinephrine being superior is still not found in the primary end point, taking a hardcore line in favor of epinephrine will be biased. Amazing paper nevertheless

6

sanzo rio

Thanks, excellent paper

6

Dr. Tony Tran

Great read - a must for medical students.

5

michael brennan

Thank you

5

Chandresh Ghevariya

Norepineprine is best choice...for any shock

3

AbdulRahman Masmaly

Excellent paper well done.

2

Victor Camacho

Interesting

2

Abdullah Mahnashi

Excellent paper

2

Sserunkuuma Bruno

Nice paper

1

upinder dial

But it doesn't mention about noradrenaline associated takotsubo cardiomyopathy....as I know there is a correlation! It will be interesting to find out how deep is that connection in shocked patient treated with noradrenaline! Nevertheless this article is very useful!

1

Roberto Valenzuela

Excellent paper.

1

Alejandro Pedraza

always NE!

0

JeJe Awag

Interesting!

0

Mohit Sahni

Well most patients with cardiac failure can be divided into groups based on arrhythmias and renal output....
norepinephrine is preferable when renal function is adequate and arrhythmias are not a problem...
But if renal function is inadequate dopamine will help with that too along with the hypotension.....

Regards....

0

Vladimir Manchurov

Norepinephrine is the first choice in pts with CS

-3

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
20200382
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"