We have located links that may give you full text access.
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
VALIDATION STUDIES
Assessment of surgical competence at carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia in a simulated operating theatre.
British Journal of Surgery 2010 April
BACKGROUND: Methods of surgical training that do not put patients at risk are desirable. A high-fidelity simulation of carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia was tested as a tool for assessment of vascular surgical competence, as an adjunct to training.
METHODS: Sixty procedures were performed by 30 vascular surgeons (ten junior trainees, ten senior trainees and ten consultants) in a simulated operating theatre. Each performed in a non-crisis scenario followed by a crisis scenario. Performance was assessed live by means of rating scales for technical and non-technical skills.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in technical skills with ascending grade for both generic and procedure-specific technical skill scores in both scenarios (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Similarly, there was also a significant difference in non-technical skill with ascending grade for both scenarios (P < 0.001). There was a highly significant correlation between technical and non-technical performance in both scenarios (non-crisis: r(s) = 0.80, P < 0.001; crisis: r(s) = 0.85, P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was high (alpha > or = 0.80 for all scales).
CONCLUSION: High-fidelity simulation offers competency-based assessment for all grades and may provide a useful training environment for junior trainees and more experienced surgeons.
METHODS: Sixty procedures were performed by 30 vascular surgeons (ten junior trainees, ten senior trainees and ten consultants) in a simulated operating theatre. Each performed in a non-crisis scenario followed by a crisis scenario. Performance was assessed live by means of rating scales for technical and non-technical skills.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in technical skills with ascending grade for both generic and procedure-specific technical skill scores in both scenarios (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Similarly, there was also a significant difference in non-technical skill with ascending grade for both scenarios (P < 0.001). There was a highly significant correlation between technical and non-technical performance in both scenarios (non-crisis: r(s) = 0.80, P < 0.001; crisis: r(s) = 0.85, P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was high (alpha > or = 0.80 for all scales).
CONCLUSION: High-fidelity simulation offers competency-based assessment for all grades and may provide a useful training environment for junior trainees and more experienced surgeons.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app