English Abstract
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of UKA versus HTO in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS: Comparative studies of UKA and HTO were retrieved from the domestic and foreign literatures and included for a meta-analysis.

RESULTS: Seven eligible randomized controlled trials included 196 UKAs and 219 HTOs. The result of Meta-analysis indicated that the ratio for an excellent outcome was higher in UKA than HTO. The combined OR was 2.43, 95%CI (1.46, 4.05) (P = 0.0006). The risks of revision and complications were lower in UKA than HTO. The combined OR was 0.47 and 0.24 and 95%CI (0.23, 0.97), (0.10, 0.56).

CONCLUSION: UKA reduces the risk of postoperative revision and complications and provides excellent outcomes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app