We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, N.I.H., EXTRAMURAL
Endurance exercise training in older patients with heart failure: results from a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2009 November
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that exercise training (ET) improves exercise capacity and other clinical outcomes in older persons with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HfrEF).
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial.
SETTING: Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine patients aged 60 and older with HFrEF recruited from hospital records and referring physicians were randomly assigned to a 16-week supervised ET program (n=30) or an attention-control, nonexercise, usual care control group (n=29).
INTERVENTION: Sixteen-week supervised ET program of endurance exercise (walking and stationary cycling) three times per week for 30 to 40 minutes at moderate intensity regulated according to heart rate and perceived exertion.
MEASUREMENTS: Individuals blinded to group assignment assessed four domains pivotal to HFrEF pathophysiology: exercise performance, left ventricular (LV) function, neuroendocrine activation, and health-related quality of life (QOL).
RESULTS: At follow-up, the ET group had significantly greater exercise time and workload than the control group, but there were no significant differences between the groups for the primary outcomes: peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO(2) peak), ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), 6-minute walk distance, QOL, LV volumes, EF, or diastolic filling. Other than serum aldosterone, there were no significant differences after ET in other neuroendocrine measurements. Despite a lack of a group "training" effect, a subset (26%) of individuals increased VO(2) peak by 10% or more and improved other clinical variables as well.
CONCLUSION: In older patients with HFrEF, ET failed to produce consistent benefits in any of the four pivotal domains of HF that were examined, although the heterogeneous response of older patients with HFrEF to ET requires further investigation to better determine which patients with HFrEF will respond favorably to ET.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial.
SETTING: Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine patients aged 60 and older with HFrEF recruited from hospital records and referring physicians were randomly assigned to a 16-week supervised ET program (n=30) or an attention-control, nonexercise, usual care control group (n=29).
INTERVENTION: Sixteen-week supervised ET program of endurance exercise (walking and stationary cycling) three times per week for 30 to 40 minutes at moderate intensity regulated according to heart rate and perceived exertion.
MEASUREMENTS: Individuals blinded to group assignment assessed four domains pivotal to HFrEF pathophysiology: exercise performance, left ventricular (LV) function, neuroendocrine activation, and health-related quality of life (QOL).
RESULTS: At follow-up, the ET group had significantly greater exercise time and workload than the control group, but there were no significant differences between the groups for the primary outcomes: peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO(2) peak), ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), 6-minute walk distance, QOL, LV volumes, EF, or diastolic filling. Other than serum aldosterone, there were no significant differences after ET in other neuroendocrine measurements. Despite a lack of a group "training" effect, a subset (26%) of individuals increased VO(2) peak by 10% or more and improved other clinical variables as well.
CONCLUSION: In older patients with HFrEF, ET failed to produce consistent benefits in any of the four pivotal domains of HF that were examined, although the heterogeneous response of older patients with HFrEF to ET requires further investigation to better determine which patients with HFrEF will respond favorably to ET.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app