Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Evaluation of linezolid, vancomycin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin in a rabbit model of antibiotic-lock technique for Staphylococcus aureus catheter-related infection.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of linezolid, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin for treating experimental Staphylococcus aureus catheter-related infection by the antibiotic-lock technique was assessed.

METHODS: Two methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) ATCC strains and two methicillin-resistant (MRSA) clinical strains were used. New Zealand white rabbits were surgically implanted with a silicone intravenous catheter. Infection was induced by filling and locking the catheter with 0.3 mL of broth culture containing S. aureus, with turbidity equivalent to that of a 0.5 McFarland standard. Eighteen hours later the antibiotic-lock technique was started and continued for 24 h. Treatment groups were: control without treatment; 2000 mg/L linezolid; 2000 mg/L vancomycin; 2000 mg/L ciprofloxacin; and 40,000 mg/L gentamicin.

RESULTS: Linezolid and vancomycin showed equivalent activity, achieving significant reductions in log(10) cfu recovered from catheter tips in one MSSA strain (>1.12) and one MRSA strain (>0.77) as compared with controls (P < 0.05). Ciprofloxacin achieved significant log(10) cfu reductions in MSSA strains relative to controls (>2.51, P < 0.01). In one MSSA strain, ciprofloxacin showed a larger reduction in log(10) cfu than linezolid or vancomycin (P < 0.01). Gentamicin was the only antibiotic achieving negative catheter tip cultures (up to 87.5% in MSSA and up to 40% in MRSA, P < 0.01), and showed the greatest log(10) cfu reduction compared with controls (>4.25 in MSSA and >2.93 in MRSA, P < 0.05) and significant differences relative to the remaining treatment groups (P < 0.05 in both MSSA and MRSA).

CONCLUSIONS: Gentamicin showed the highest activity against both MSSA and MRSA biofilms.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app