Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Virtual crossmatch by identification of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies by solid-phase immunoassay: a 30-month analysis in living donor kidney transplantation.

Human Immunology 2010 March
Selection of donors for kidney transplantation depends on accurate prediction of risk factors for immunologic rejection. Historically, cytotoxicity crossmatch (CXM) examining lysis of donor cells by preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (Abs) has been considered the best predictor of immunologic rejection. However, there is much interest in defining anti-HLA Ab specificity in recipient sera by immunoassay to predict crossmatch results and aid in donor selection. Current immunoassays for anti-HLA Abs are highly sensitive, though correlation between Abs detected by immunoassay and their functional relevance in CXM and subsequent transplantation is not well defined. In this study, we retrospectively examined the predictive value of detection of donor-specific anti-HLA Abs (DSA) by Luminex Single Antigen assay from 149 consecutive living donor kidney transplant recipients. We demonstrate that detection of DSA by immunoassay accurately predicted negative crossmatch and graft survival. However, this approach had limited sensitivity for predicting positive crossmatch, attributable to either limited typing of donor HLA-DQ and -DP alleles or due to non-HLA Abs. False-positive prediction of CXM correlated with detection of "weak" Abs with low mean fluorescence intensity (MFI < 2000). Furthermore, we found that a ratio of the MFI of the DSA bead to the MFI of the positive control bead was a better method for identifying weak DSA that did not result in CXM-positive reactions. Interestingly, patients with weak DSA and negative CXM had equivalent graft survival over an 18 month follow-up period, suggesting that weak DSA may not preclude transplantation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app