We have located links that may give you full text access.
Handling a high relaxivity contrast material for dynamic breast MR imaging using higher thresholds for the initial enhancement.
Investigative Radiology 2010 March
OBJECTIVES: To increase specificity of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging without losing sensitivity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB approval was obtained for this retrospective study and informed consent was waived. Sixty-eight patients with 73 breast lesions underwent dynamic breast 1.5-T MR imaging with 0.1 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine and 103 or 111-second temporal resolution. A score system based on shape (round/oval/lobular = 0, linear/dendritic/stellate = 1), margins (defined = 0, undefined = 1), pattern (homogeneous = 0, inhomogeneous = 1, rim = 2), kinetics (continuous = 0, plateau = 1, washout = 2), and initial enhancement was used. Initial enhancement was evaluated with standard (<50% = 0, 50%-100% = 1, >100% = 2) or adjusted (<180% = 0, 180%-240% = 1, >240% = 2) thresholds. Scores 0-2, 3, 4 or 5, and from 6 to 8 were considered as equivalent to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Pathologic examination (core-, vacuum-assisted, or surgical biopsy) served as a reference standard. Nonparametric tests were used.
RESULTS: At histopathology, 52 lesions were malignant, 21 were benign. The initial enhancement for benign lesions was 141% +/- 65% (mean +/- SD), whereas for malignant lesions it was 210% +/- 80% (P = 0.001). The median multifactorial score for benign lesions was 4 using the standard thresholds and 3 using the adjusted thresholds (P < 0.001) whereas for malignant lesions it was 7 and 6, respectively (P < 0.001). Specificity increased from 38% with standard thresholds to 71% with adjusted thresholds (gain of 33%; P = 0.016); positive predictive value 80% and 90%, negative predictive value 100% and 100%, and accuracy 82% and 92%, respectively. Sensitivity was 100% for both thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS: Specificity of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced breast MR imaging can be increased without limiting its high sensitivity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB approval was obtained for this retrospective study and informed consent was waived. Sixty-eight patients with 73 breast lesions underwent dynamic breast 1.5-T MR imaging with 0.1 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine and 103 or 111-second temporal resolution. A score system based on shape (round/oval/lobular = 0, linear/dendritic/stellate = 1), margins (defined = 0, undefined = 1), pattern (homogeneous = 0, inhomogeneous = 1, rim = 2), kinetics (continuous = 0, plateau = 1, washout = 2), and initial enhancement was used. Initial enhancement was evaluated with standard (<50% = 0, 50%-100% = 1, >100% = 2) or adjusted (<180% = 0, 180%-240% = 1, >240% = 2) thresholds. Scores 0-2, 3, 4 or 5, and from 6 to 8 were considered as equivalent to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Pathologic examination (core-, vacuum-assisted, or surgical biopsy) served as a reference standard. Nonparametric tests were used.
RESULTS: At histopathology, 52 lesions were malignant, 21 were benign. The initial enhancement for benign lesions was 141% +/- 65% (mean +/- SD), whereas for malignant lesions it was 210% +/- 80% (P = 0.001). The median multifactorial score for benign lesions was 4 using the standard thresholds and 3 using the adjusted thresholds (P < 0.001) whereas for malignant lesions it was 7 and 6, respectively (P < 0.001). Specificity increased from 38% with standard thresholds to 71% with adjusted thresholds (gain of 33%; P = 0.016); positive predictive value 80% and 90%, negative predictive value 100% and 100%, and accuracy 82% and 92%, respectively. Sensitivity was 100% for both thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS: Specificity of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced breast MR imaging can be increased without limiting its high sensitivity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app