We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
[Effect of dexmedetomidine on anesthetic requirements in cardiovascular surgery].
Masui. the Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology 2009 December
BACKGROUND: An anesthetic-sparing effect of dexmedetomidine has been shown in several studies. We investigated the effect of dexmedetomidine on anesthetic requirements in 24 patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.
METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into two groups in which continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine was started before induction of anesthesia (DEX group, n = 12) or when closing the sternum (control group, n = 12). Dexmedetomidine was administered intravenously at 0.7 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) after a bolus infusion at 6.0 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) for 10 min. All patients received total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl.
RESULTS: Mean effect-site concentration of propofol was significantly lower in the DEX group than in the control group (1.9 +/- 0.3 microg x ml(-1) vs 2.5 +/- 0.8 microg x ml(-1)). Mean effect-site concentration of fentanyl in the DEX group was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.93 +/- 0.41 ng x ml(-1) vs 2.67 +/- 0.70 ng x ml(-1).
CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of dexmedetomidine decreases anesthetic requirements in cardiovascular surgery.
METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into two groups in which continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine was started before induction of anesthesia (DEX group, n = 12) or when closing the sternum (control group, n = 12). Dexmedetomidine was administered intravenously at 0.7 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) after a bolus infusion at 6.0 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) for 10 min. All patients received total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl.
RESULTS: Mean effect-site concentration of propofol was significantly lower in the DEX group than in the control group (1.9 +/- 0.3 microg x ml(-1) vs 2.5 +/- 0.8 microg x ml(-1)). Mean effect-site concentration of fentanyl in the DEX group was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.93 +/- 0.41 ng x ml(-1) vs 2.67 +/- 0.70 ng x ml(-1).
CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of dexmedetomidine decreases anesthetic requirements in cardiovascular surgery.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app