Retrospective, matched case-control study comparing the oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in patients with right-sided colon cancer.

PURPOSE: The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer remain largely uninvestigated. This study was undertaken to compare the morbidity and mortality after either a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC) or an open right hemicolectomy (ORHC) for this type of tumor.

METHODS: The study group included 100 patients who underwent an LRHC and 100 patients who underwent an ORHC for right-sided colon cancer from 1990 through 2004. The two groups were retrospectively well matched with respect to sex, age (+/-5 years), and pathological tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage.

RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 83 months in the LRHC group and 105 months in the ORHC group. The LRHC group had a lower volume of intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.001), a lower rate of wound infection (P = 0.019) or postoperative intestinal obstruction (P = 0.013), and a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001) than the ORHC group. The rate of recurrence did not differ significantly between the LRHC group (19%) and the ORHC group (22%). In patients with TNM stage I or II, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate (94.9% vs 95.1%) and overall survival (OS) rate (95.8% vs 95.0%) did not differ significantly between the two groups. A similar tendency was observed in patients with stage III with the rates for DFS (71.3% vs 60.4%) and OS (73.6% vs 64.1%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: An LRHC for right-sided colon cancer has the advantage over an ORHC of better short-term outcomes, and both groups have similar long-term oncologic outcomes. An LRHC is thus an acceptable alternative to an ORHC for the treatment of this type cancer.