COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparative kinematic evaluation of all-inside single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study

Andrew G Tsai, Coen A Wijdicks, Michael P Walsh, Robert F Laprade
American Journal of Sports Medicine 2010, 38 (2): 263-72
19966094

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of single-bundle versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction in improving knee stability has been widely discussed. The biomechanics of all-inside double-bundle ACL reconstructions have not been evaluated.

HYPOTHESIS: An anatomic all-inside double-bundle ACL reconstruction will more effectively restore native knee kinematics in vitro, especially rotational stability, when compared with an all-inside single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS: Seven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric human knees were used. Knees were tested using 88 N of force for anterior and posterior drawers, 5 N.m internal and external rotation moments, 10 N.m valgus and varus moments, and coupled 5 N.m internal rotation and 10 N.m valgus moments to simulate a pivot shift at 0 degrees , 20 degrees , 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees of knee flexion. Motion of the knee in response to external loading was measured with a Polhemus electromagnetic tracking system. Knees were first tested in the intact state, with either the anteromedial or posterolateral bundle cut, and then with both bundles cut. Subsequently, 7 single-bundle and 7 double-bundle all-inside ACL reconstructions were performed.

RESULTS: Both single- and double-bundle all-inside ACL reconstructions restored knee kinematics for posterior drawer, varus/valgus rotation, and internal/external rotation motions. After single-bundle all-inside ACL reconstruction, anterior translation during the simulated pivot-shift test was significantly higher compared with the intact state at 20 degrees , 30 degrees , and 60 degrees of flexion. There was no significant difference between the double-bundle all-inside ACL reconstruction and the intact knee during a simulated pivot shift. Conclusion We found that an all-inside double-bundle ACL reconstruction demonstrated significant improvement in restoring normal rotational knee motion during simulated pivot-shift testing compared with single-bundle ACL reconstructions in vitro, with no significant differences in other knee loading conditions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All-inside double-bundle ACL reconstruction may provide advantages over single-bundle ACL reconstruction for rotational knee stability.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
19966094
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"