Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Twin Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Challenging the cumulative injury model: positive effects of greater body mass on disc degeneration.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There are differing views as to the causes of disc degeneration. One view, referred to as a cumulative or repetitive injury model, explains disc degeneration, in great part, as the result of "wear and tear" on the disc from routine daily exposures to physical loading or biomechanical forces. Perhaps paradoxically, such physical loading has been thought to be generally beneficial for other structures of the musculoskeletal system.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the associations of physical loading from body weight using quantitative measures of disc degeneration.

STUDY DESIGN: This is an exposure-discordant twin study.

METHODS: We selected 44 pairs of healthy male monozygotic (MZ) twins with 8 kg or more discordance in body weight (mean 13 kg), with lumbar magnetic resonance imaging and bone density measurements available. The main outcome of disc degeneration was assessed through quantitatively measured disc height, and disc signal intensity and signal variation adjusted by the intrabody reference, adjacent cerebrospinal fluid signal, at L1-L4. Data on suspected constitutional and environmental risk factors were available for control of possible confounding factors.

RESULTS: Higher body weight was associated with 6.2% higher bone density in the lumbar spine, confirming an effective discordance (p<.0001). Disc signal variation was 5.4% higher ("better") among the heavier MZ co-twins (p=.005), but the 2.6% higher disc heights and 2.9% higher adjusted disc signals were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to common beliefs, our findings suggest that cumulative or repetitive loading because of higher body mass (nearly 30 pounds on average) was not harmful to the discs. In fact, a slight delay in L1-L4 disc desiccation was observed in the heavier men, as compared with their lighter twin brothers.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app