Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Abdominal wall reconstruction: lessons learned from 200 "components separation" procedures.

Archives of Surgery 2009 November
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and describe the evolution of the "components separation" technique for abdominal wall repair in 200 consecutive patients.

DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review.

SETTING: Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.

PATIENTS: Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent ventral hernia repair using the components separation technique.

INTERVENTIONS: Biological and permanent meshes were used in select patients to augment the repair of the midline fascial closure but were not used as "bridging" materials.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hernia recurrence rates and major and minor complication rates for the overall series and for the different techniques.

RESULTS: Primary components separation (n = 158) yielded a 22.8% recurrence rate. Closure of the midline tissues with augmentation of the repair using an acellular cadaveric dermis underlay (n = 18) had a 33.3% recurrence rate requiring a second operation, whereas intra-abdominal soft polypropylene mesh (n = 18) had 0% recurrence (P = .04). Elevated body mass index was a significant risk factor predicting hernia recurrence (P = .003). Contamination (P = .04) and enterocutaneous fistula (P = .02) at the time of surgery were associated with increased major complications, whereas body mass index (P = .01) and diabetes mellitus (P = .04) were associated with increased minor complications.

CONCLUSIONS: Large complex hernias can be reliably repaired using the components separation technique despite the presence of open wounds, the need for bowel surgery, and numerous comorbidities. The long-term strength of the hernia repair is not augmented by acellular cadaveric dermis but seems to be improved with soft polypropylene mesh.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app