JOURNAL ARTICLE

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) should be routinely performed for the detection of parathyroid abnormalities utilizing technetium-99m sestamibi parathyroid scintigraphy

Damita L Thomas, Twyla Bartel, Yusuf Menda, James Howe, Michael M Graham, Malik E Juweid
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 2009, 34 (10): 651-5
19893394

RATIONALE: The current procedure guideline for performing dual-phase (DP) parathyroid scintigraphy, using technetium-99m sestamibi (Tc-99m MIBI) does not mandate the use of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging for the detection of parathyroid adenoma (PA) or hyperplasia (PH). The aim of our study was to determine whether DP SPECT (DPS) is significantly superior to DP planar (DPP) imaging in the detection of these abnormalities, justifying its routine use with Tc-99m MIBI parathyroid scintigraphy.

METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients with biochemically-proven hyperparathyroidism who subsequently underwent surgical evaluation were studied. All patients underwent early and delayed planar and SPECT imaging at 15 and 90 minutes postinjection of 1.11 GBq (30 mCi) of Tc-99m MIBI. The sensitivity and false-positive rate of DPP and DPS Tc-99m MIBI scintigraphy were compared by retrospectively and blindly interpreting the images and comparing the results with surgical findings.

RESULTS: All 36 patients were shown to have either 1 PA (n=27), 2 PAs (n=1), or PH (n=8). Overall, 29 adenomas and 24 hyperplastic glands were found at surgery. On a per patient basis, the sensitivity for the detection of PA or PH for DPP was 42% (15/36) compared with 67% (24/36) for DPS (P = 0.03). For the detection of PAs, the sensitivity of DPP was 54% (15/28) versus 79% (22/28) for DPS (P = 0.05), whereas for the detection of PH, the sensitivities were 0% (0/8) for DPP versus 25% (2/8) for DPS (P = 0.13). There were 2 false-positive scans using DPP versus only 1 false-positive scan with DPS, resulting in false-positive rates of 7% and 4%, respectively. The combination of DPP and DPS did not add any advantage in detecting either PA or PH compared with DPS alone.

CONCLUSIONS: DPS is significantly more sensitive, and at least as specific, compared with DPP in detecting parathyroid abnormalities in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and should, therefore, be routinely used when DP Tc-99m MIBI is used in this setting. An algorithm for best utilization of this technique to determine the appropriate surgical approach in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism is presented.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
19893394
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.