COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of safety of subcutaneous enoxaparin as outpatient anticoagulation bridging therapy in patients with a mechanical heart valve versus patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Patients with mechanical heart valves (MHVs) are at a higher risk for thromboembolic events than patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This difference is observed in the higher maintenance international normalized ratio (INR) range for patients with MHV and in the selection for anticoagulation bridge therapy when warfarin is interrupted perioperatively. However, once the decision is made to "bridge," the same therapeutic options, unfractionated heparin and subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), are applicable to the 2 patient populations. Unfractionated heparin requires extended hospitalization and is often not selected. A paucity of published data exist establishing the efficacy and safety of LMWH as a bridging agent. The aim of this study was to describe a single-center experience and to provide data supporting the use of enoxaparin as a bridging agent. The study assessed whether patients with MHV undergoing bridging for a variety of procedures had higher thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk compared to patients with nonvalvular AF. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 173 patients (with MHV and AF) who underwent 230 bridging episodes with an LMWH, enoxaparin, from February 2002 through September 2007. Main outcome measurements were the incidence of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events within 2 months after the procedure. Of total bridging episodes, 130 episodes met the inclusion criteria; 62 episodes occurred in the MHV population and 68 episodes occurred in the AF population. The procedures varied from minor invasive procedures to major surgeries. There were no deaths or thromboembolic events. Major and minor bleeding rates were similar between the MHV and AF groups (3.2% and 2.9%, 14.5% and 13.2% respectively, p = NS). The major bleeding rate was similar to published data on bridging therapy. Most bleeding episodes (73%) occurred within 7 days after the procedure. In conclusion, our study provided actual outpatient anticoagulation clinical data on using LMWH as an option for periprocedural bridging anticoagulation in patients with MHV.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app