We have located links that may give you full text access.
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Usefulness of the evaluation of isovolumic and ejection phase myocardial signals during stress echocardiography in predicting exercise capacity in heart failure patients.
Echocardiography 2009 October
AIM: To assess changes of systolic function using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) during stress echocardiography and its impact on exercise capacity in heart failure (HF) patients (pts).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 80 pts (65 male), mean age of 59.3 +/- 10.9 years, NYHA class 1.95 +/- 0.8, left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) 27.2 +/- 9.5 (10-45%). The etiology of HF was ischemic (ICM) in 50 pts and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in 30 pts. Peak myocardial velocity (IVV) and acceleration (IVA) during isovolumic contraction and peak myocardial velocity during ejection phase (S') were measured at baseline and peak exercise during semi-supine stress-echo (20 Watts, 2-min increments). Concurrently peak oxygen uptake (VO(2) peak) was measured.
RESULTS: Rest values of analyzed parameters were comparable in groups according to etiology of HF and physical capacity. However, peak stress parameters mainly S' were significantly higher in the DCM group and the group with better VO(2) peak. The best correlation with exercise capacity was S' at peak stress (r = 0.66; p < 0.0001). The most useful parameter for identifying severe exercise intolerance, VO(2) peak < 14 ml/kg/min, was S' with an area under ROC curve of 0.82 +/- 0.05 (95% CI 0.71-0.89). The cutoff of 5.75 cm/s for S' at peak stress showed a sensitivity of 61% with a specificity of 96%.
CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of systolic function by means of TDI instead of LVEF shows more clearly that systolic function is at least partly responsible for exercise tolerance in HF. Assessment of echocardiographic systolic parameters at peak stress provides more accurate information about exercise capacity in HF pts.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 80 pts (65 male), mean age of 59.3 +/- 10.9 years, NYHA class 1.95 +/- 0.8, left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) 27.2 +/- 9.5 (10-45%). The etiology of HF was ischemic (ICM) in 50 pts and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in 30 pts. Peak myocardial velocity (IVV) and acceleration (IVA) during isovolumic contraction and peak myocardial velocity during ejection phase (S') were measured at baseline and peak exercise during semi-supine stress-echo (20 Watts, 2-min increments). Concurrently peak oxygen uptake (VO(2) peak) was measured.
RESULTS: Rest values of analyzed parameters were comparable in groups according to etiology of HF and physical capacity. However, peak stress parameters mainly S' were significantly higher in the DCM group and the group with better VO(2) peak. The best correlation with exercise capacity was S' at peak stress (r = 0.66; p < 0.0001). The most useful parameter for identifying severe exercise intolerance, VO(2) peak < 14 ml/kg/min, was S' with an area under ROC curve of 0.82 +/- 0.05 (95% CI 0.71-0.89). The cutoff of 5.75 cm/s for S' at peak stress showed a sensitivity of 61% with a specificity of 96%.
CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of systolic function by means of TDI instead of LVEF shows more clearly that systolic function is at least partly responsible for exercise tolerance in HF. Assessment of echocardiographic systolic parameters at peak stress provides more accurate information about exercise capacity in HF pts.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app