JOURNAL ARTICLE

Central venous pressure versus pulmonary artery catheter-directed shock resuscitation

Bruce A McKinley, Joseph F Sucher, S Rob Todd, Ernest A Gonzalez, Rosemary A Kozar, R Matthew Sailors, Frederick A Moore
Shock 2009, 32 (5): 463-70
19829240
Previously, we developed a protocol for shock resuscitation of severe trauma patients to reverse shock and regain hemodynamic stability during the first 24 intensive care unit (ICU) hours. Key hemodynamic measurements of cardiac output and preload were obtained using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). As an alternative, we developed a protocol that used central venous pressure (CVP) to guide decision making for interventions to regain hemodynamic stability [mean arterial pressure (MAP) >or= 65 mmHg and heart rate (HR) <or= 130 bpm]. Either protocol was available and required for traumatic shock resuscitation using bedside computerized clinical decision support to standardize decision making, and PAC was available if CVP-directed resuscitation was inadequate. We hypothesized that patients would be appropriately assigned to either protocol by trauma surgeon assessment of hemodynamic stability upon ICU admission. High-risk patients admitted to a level-1 trauma center ICU underwent resuscitation. Criteria were 1) major torso trauma, 2) base deficit (BD) >or= 6 mEq/L or systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, 3) transfusion of >or= 1 unit packed red blood cells (PRBC), or >or= age 65 years with two of three criteria. Patients with brain injury were excluded. Data were recorded prospectively. In 24 months ending July 31, 2006, of 193 patients, 114 (59%) were assigned CVP- directed resuscitation, and 79 (41%) were assigned PAC-directed resuscitation. A subgroup of 11 (10%) initially assigned CVP was reassigned PAC-directed resuscitation (7 +/- 2 h after start) due to hemodynamic instability. Crystalloid fluid and PRBC resuscitation volumes for PAC (8 +/- 1 L lactated Ringer's [LR], 5 +/- 0.4 units PRBC) were > CVP (5 +/- 0.4 L LR, 3 +/- 0.3 units PRBC) and similar to CVP - PAC protocol subgroup patients (9 +/- 2 L LR, 5 +/- 1 units PRBC). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay and survival rate for PAC (18 +/- 2 days, 75%) were similar to CVP - PAC (17 +/- 4 days, 73%) and worse than CVP protocol subgroup patients (9 +/- 1 days, 98%). Traumatic shock resuscitation is feasible using CVP as a primary hemodynamic monitor as part of a protocol that includes explicit definition of hemodynamic instability and where PAC monitoring is readily available. Computerized decision support provides a technique to implement complex protocol care processes and analyze patient response.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
19829240
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"