We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Lanthanum carbonate vs. sevelamer hydrochloride for the reduction of serum phosphorus in hemodialysis patients: a crossover study.
Clinical Nephrology 2009 October
AIMS: The aim of this crossover study was to compare the reduction of serum phosphorus (SP) with fixed doses of the non-calcium-containing phosphate binders lanthanum carbonate (LC) and sevelamer hydrochloride (SH) in hemodialysis patients.
METHODS: Following washout (2 - 3 weeks), 182 patients with SP >or= 6.0 mg/dl and calcium >or= 8.4 mg/dl were randomized (1:1) to receive LC (2,250 to 3,000 mg/day) or SH (4,800 to 6,400 mg/day) for 4 weeks. Patients underwent a second washout (2 weeks) and switched to the alternative binder for 4 weeks.
RESULTS: At the end of treatment, LC had reduced SP by 1.7 +/- 0.1 mg/dl, compared with 1.4 +/- 0.1 mg/dl for SH; the difference was not statistically significant in the primary analysis (LOCF, p = 0.133). However, the reduction with LC was significantly greater than with SH in a prespecified key secondary analysis of patients who completed 4 weeks of treatment with each binder (0.5 mg/dl difference, p = 0.007). The reduction of SP was also greater with LC than SH after 1 week of treatment (p = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary analysis found no difference between LC and SH in the reduction of SP, a significant difference in favor of LC was observed in patients who completed treatment. The results of this study show interesting trends with respect to onset and duration of action that warrant further investigation in longer-term studies.
METHODS: Following washout (2 - 3 weeks), 182 patients with SP >or= 6.0 mg/dl and calcium >or= 8.4 mg/dl were randomized (1:1) to receive LC (2,250 to 3,000 mg/day) or SH (4,800 to 6,400 mg/day) for 4 weeks. Patients underwent a second washout (2 weeks) and switched to the alternative binder for 4 weeks.
RESULTS: At the end of treatment, LC had reduced SP by 1.7 +/- 0.1 mg/dl, compared with 1.4 +/- 0.1 mg/dl for SH; the difference was not statistically significant in the primary analysis (LOCF, p = 0.133). However, the reduction with LC was significantly greater than with SH in a prespecified key secondary analysis of patients who completed 4 weeks of treatment with each binder (0.5 mg/dl difference, p = 0.007). The reduction of SP was also greater with LC than SH after 1 week of treatment (p = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary analysis found no difference between LC and SH in the reduction of SP, a significant difference in favor of LC was observed in patients who completed treatment. The results of this study show interesting trends with respect to onset and duration of action that warrant further investigation in longer-term studies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app