JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
The use of D-dimer with new cutoff can be useful in diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: D-dimer testing has an important role in the exclusion of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the nonpregnant population. Establishing D-dimers role in the diagnosis of VTE in pregnancy is hampered because of the substantial increase of D-dimer throughout gestational age.
STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective study we followed 89 healthy pregnant women to establish the reference range of D-dimer for each trimester. D-dimer testing was also performed in 12 women with clinical suspicion of VTE and their results were compared with the established new reference range of D-dimer, and with the recorded ultrasound findings.
RESULTS: In the first trimester, 84% women from reference group had normal D-dimer, in the second 33%, and by the third trimester only 1%, which suggests that D-dimer has no practical diagnostic use in ruling out VTE if the threshold of 230 ng/mL for abnormal is used. All pregnant women with thrombosis who had positive ultrasound findings also had statistically significant elevation of the D-dimer level, considering the established reference range of the corresponding trimester. We found 100% sensitivity of D-dimer test. A women developed thrombosis in the first trimester had 6.7-7.6 time higher level of D-dimer than the mean value in the reference group, and in the third trimester thrombotic women had 2.0-3.8 time higher level of D-dimer, p<0.0001.
CONCLUSION: D-dimer test with the new threshold for: the first of 286, the second of 457 and the third trimester of 644 ng/mL can be useful in diagnosis of pregnancy related VTE.
STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective study we followed 89 healthy pregnant women to establish the reference range of D-dimer for each trimester. D-dimer testing was also performed in 12 women with clinical suspicion of VTE and their results were compared with the established new reference range of D-dimer, and with the recorded ultrasound findings.
RESULTS: In the first trimester, 84% women from reference group had normal D-dimer, in the second 33%, and by the third trimester only 1%, which suggests that D-dimer has no practical diagnostic use in ruling out VTE if the threshold of 230 ng/mL for abnormal is used. All pregnant women with thrombosis who had positive ultrasound findings also had statistically significant elevation of the D-dimer level, considering the established reference range of the corresponding trimester. We found 100% sensitivity of D-dimer test. A women developed thrombosis in the first trimester had 6.7-7.6 time higher level of D-dimer than the mean value in the reference group, and in the third trimester thrombotic women had 2.0-3.8 time higher level of D-dimer, p<0.0001.
CONCLUSION: D-dimer test with the new threshold for: the first of 286, the second of 457 and the third trimester of 644 ng/mL can be useful in diagnosis of pregnancy related VTE.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Carvedilol, probably the β-blocker of choice for everyone with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: But not so fast!Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2023 June
Evidence-Based Guideline for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.Nature Reviews. Rheumatology 2023 May 10
Advances in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment: Current Status and Future Directions.AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2023 May 19
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app