We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Comparative analysis of neointimal coverage with paclitaxel and zotarolimus drug-eluting stents, using optical coherence tomography 6 months after implantation.
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 2009 August
BACKGROUND: Intrastent thrombosis, while rare, has a poor prognosis. Strut non-coverage is one causal factor, especially in cases of resistance to or premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy.
AIM: To compare neointimal coverage with paclitaxel and zotarolimus drug-eluting stents, using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
METHODS: Twenty-two drug-eluting stents (11 paclitaxel-eluting stents and 11 zotarolimus-eluting stents) were examined by OCT, 6 months after implantation. Mean neointimal strut-coverage thickness and percentage neointimal hyperplasia were measured every millimetre. On each OCT image, struts were classified into one of four categories: well-apposed to vessel wall with apparent neointimal coverage; well-apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage; malapposed to the vessel wall; or located on a major side branch.
RESULTS: OCT analysis showed a lower percentage of neointimal hyperplasia with paclitaxel-eluting stents than with zotarolimus-eluting stents (17% vs 38% and mean thickness 154 microm vs 333 microm, respectively; p<0.0001). The rate of strut-coverage was greater with zotarolimus-eluting stents than with paclitaxel-eluting stents (99.1% vs 87.1%, respectively; p<0.0001). A non-covered/covered strut ratio greater than 0.3 was observed in 0.5% of zotarolimus-eluting stent OCT images compared with 18% of paclitaxel-eluting stent OCT images (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Six months after implantation, neointimal hyperplasia was greater with zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents. Conversely, neointimal strut-coverage was better with zotarolimus-eluting stents.
AIM: To compare neointimal coverage with paclitaxel and zotarolimus drug-eluting stents, using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
METHODS: Twenty-two drug-eluting stents (11 paclitaxel-eluting stents and 11 zotarolimus-eluting stents) were examined by OCT, 6 months after implantation. Mean neointimal strut-coverage thickness and percentage neointimal hyperplasia were measured every millimetre. On each OCT image, struts were classified into one of four categories: well-apposed to vessel wall with apparent neointimal coverage; well-apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage; malapposed to the vessel wall; or located on a major side branch.
RESULTS: OCT analysis showed a lower percentage of neointimal hyperplasia with paclitaxel-eluting stents than with zotarolimus-eluting stents (17% vs 38% and mean thickness 154 microm vs 333 microm, respectively; p<0.0001). The rate of strut-coverage was greater with zotarolimus-eluting stents than with paclitaxel-eluting stents (99.1% vs 87.1%, respectively; p<0.0001). A non-covered/covered strut ratio greater than 0.3 was observed in 0.5% of zotarolimus-eluting stent OCT images compared with 18% of paclitaxel-eluting stent OCT images (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Six months after implantation, neointimal hyperplasia was greater with zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents. Conversely, neointimal strut-coverage was better with zotarolimus-eluting stents.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app