We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of esophageal carcinosarcoma.
Anticancer Research 2009 August
BACKGROUND: Esophageal carcinosarcoma is a very rare neoplasm and its clinicopathological characteristics and the prognostic factors that influence the clinical outcome of the patient remain a matter of controversy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with esophageal carcinosarcoma were referred to our institutions. Tissue blocks were reviewed and sections containing both carcinomatous and sarcomatous components were stained for epithelial and mesenchymal markers and a proliferating cell marker. The prognosis of the esophageal carcinosarcoma patients was compared with 142 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
RESULTS: In the carcinomatous component, the expression of cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen, vimentin, smooth muscle actin, and S100 were detected in 20, 20, 1, 1, and 1 case, respectively, whereas in the sarcomatous component, expression of these were detected in 4, 2, 18, 15, and 3 cases, respectively. The Ki-67 labeling index of carcinomatous and sarcomatous components was 35.5% and 41.8%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was not statistically different between squamous cell carcinoma and carcinosarcoma (p=0.219). However, for T1 cases only, carcinosarcoma patients had statistically poorer prognosis than did squamous cell carcinoma patients (p=0.008).
CONCLUSION: The sarcomatous component shows various histological and immunohistochemical forms. In comparison with squamous cell carcinoma patients, carcinosarcoma patients had poorer prognosis amongst the T1 cases. For the treatment of esophageal carcinosarcoma, it is important to monitor lymph nodes and be watchful for hematogenous metastasis, as in cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with esophageal carcinosarcoma were referred to our institutions. Tissue blocks were reviewed and sections containing both carcinomatous and sarcomatous components were stained for epithelial and mesenchymal markers and a proliferating cell marker. The prognosis of the esophageal carcinosarcoma patients was compared with 142 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
RESULTS: In the carcinomatous component, the expression of cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen, vimentin, smooth muscle actin, and S100 were detected in 20, 20, 1, 1, and 1 case, respectively, whereas in the sarcomatous component, expression of these were detected in 4, 2, 18, 15, and 3 cases, respectively. The Ki-67 labeling index of carcinomatous and sarcomatous components was 35.5% and 41.8%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was not statistically different between squamous cell carcinoma and carcinosarcoma (p=0.219). However, for T1 cases only, carcinosarcoma patients had statistically poorer prognosis than did squamous cell carcinoma patients (p=0.008).
CONCLUSION: The sarcomatous component shows various histological and immunohistochemical forms. In comparison with squamous cell carcinoma patients, carcinosarcoma patients had poorer prognosis amongst the T1 cases. For the treatment of esophageal carcinosarcoma, it is important to monitor lymph nodes and be watchful for hematogenous metastasis, as in cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app