COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Analgesic effectiveness of ropivacaine 0.2% vs 0.4% via an ultrasound-guided C5-6 root/superior trunk perineural ambulatory catheter

M J Fredrickson, D J Price
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009, 103 (3): 434-9
19608563

BACKGROUND: In this prospective, randomized, triple-blinded study, we tested the hypothesis that a 48 h continuous C5-6 root/superior trunk patient-controlled infusion of ropivacaine 0.4% would provide superior analgesia after shoulder surgery compared with the same infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%.

METHODS: Patients presenting for painful shoulder surgery were recruited. A perineural catheter was placed under ultrasound guidance immediately adjacent to the C5-6 roots/superior trunk. Ropivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) (30 ml) was administered via this catheter before surgery under general anaesthesia. At the end of surgery, patients were randomized to receive ropivacaine 2 mg ml(-1) (0.2%) (n=32) or 4 mg ml(-1) (0.4%) (n=33) via an elastomeric pump delivering 2 ml h(-1) with on-demand patient-controlled boluses of 5 ml as required. Acetaminophen and diclofenac were administered if any postoperative pain occurred, ropivacaine boluses for a numerical rating pain score (NRPS, 0-10) of >2, and rescue tramadol for an NRPS >3. All patients were phoned on postoperative days 1 and 2 and questioned for indices of treatment effectiveness and adverse effects.

RESULTS: NRPS, patient ropivacaine demands, and supplemental tramadol consumption were similar in each group [median 'average daily pain' days 1/2 (0.2%=1/3, 0.4%=2/3)]. Episodes of an insensate/densely blocked arm occurred only with ropivacaine 0.4% (5 vs 0 episodes, P=0.05). Satisfaction (numerical rating scale, 0-10) was higher for ropivacaine 0.2% [mean difference (95% confidence interval)=1.3 (0.3-2.4), P=0.01)].

CONCLUSIONS: After major shoulder surgery, ropivacaine 0.2% at 2 ml h(-1) with on-demand 5 ml boluses administered via an ultrasound-guided C5-6 root/superior trunk perineural catheter produces similar analgesia, but higher patient satisfaction compared with ropivacaine 0.4%.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR: ACTRN12608000591358. URL: www.anzctr.org.au/registry/trial_review.aspx?ID=83028.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
19608563
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"