A phase II dose-ranging study of palonosetron in Japanese patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, including anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy

Y Segawa, K Aogi, K Inoue, M Sano, I Sekine, Y Tokuda, H Isobe, T Ogura, M Tsuboi, S Atagi
Annals of Oncology: Official Journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 2009, 20 (11): 1874-80

BACKGROUND: The 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists (RAs) help maintain the standard of care, in various combinations with other agents, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Palonosetron is a new generation 5-HT(3) RA with indication not only acute but also delayed nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). This study was carried out to determine the optimal dosage of palonosetron in combination with dexamethasone in patients in Japan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of palonosetron in patients receiving MEC combined with dexamethasone. Patients received single doses of 0.075, 0.25, or 0.75 mg of palonosetron before MEC. Dexamethasone was infused before palonosetron, at 20 mg for the patients receiving paclitaxel (Taxol) and 8 mg for the patients not receiving paclitaxel. The primary end point was complete response (CR: no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) in the acute phase (0-24 h).

RESULTS: In total, 204 patients (88 men, 116 women; 96 with paclitaxel, 108 without paclitaxel) were assessable for efficacy. No dose-response relationship was observed regarding the CR rate in the acute phase. CR rates increased dose dependently for delayed (24-120 h) and overall (0-120 h) phases in patients receiving anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide combination (AC/EC, n = 80); however, the difference in CR rates among doses was not statistically significant. The most commonly reported adverse events related to palonosetron were constipation and headache, confirming the class safety profile.

CONCLUSION: This study indicates a statistically nonsignificant trend for the dose-response relationship for antiemetic protection in the delayed and overall phases in AC/EC patients (the regimen currently considered to be more emetogenic than MEC).

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article


You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.


Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"