COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Comparison of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers during lung-protective mechanical ventilation in patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome

Michel Badet, Frédérique Bayle, Jean-Christophe Richard, Claude Guérin
Respiratory Care 2009, 54 (7): 847-54
19558735

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the use of alveolar-recruitment maneuvers to improve oxygenation is controversial. There is lack of standardization and lack of clinical studies to compare various recruitment maneuvers. Recruitment maneuvers are closely linked to the selection of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which is also a subject of debate.

METHODS: With 12 intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with early ALI/ARDS we conducted a recruitment maneuver (sustained inflation at 40 cm H(2)O for 30 s), then set PEEP at 24 cm H(2)O, and then we reduced PEEP stepwise, by 4 cm H(2)O every 10 min. We kept the fraction of inspired oxygen (F(IO(2))) at 0.8. After each PEEP decrement step we measured P(aO(2)). We defined the "optimal" PEEP as the PEEP step above which P(aO(2)) decreased by > or = 20%. All the patients then underwent a period of ventilation on the same settings: tidal volume 6 mL/kg, PEEP at the level set by the physician before the experiment, plateau pressure < 30 cm H(2)O. Then each patient underwent 3 ventilation strategies, each applied for one hour: optimal PEEP alone; optimal PEEP plus one sustained inflation (40 cm H(2)O for 30 s); and optimal PEEP plus sigh breaths (ie, twice the baseline tidal volume, plateau pressure < 40 cm H(2)O) every 25 breaths. After the application of each PEEP strategy we measured arterial blood gas values and the static compliance of the respiratory system.

RESULTS: The mean +/- SD optimal PEEP was 12 +/- 4 cm H(2)O. The measurements from the standardization periods were comparable between the 3 PEEP groups. In the optimal-PEEP-plus-sighs group the changes in P(aO(2)) (85 +/- 96%) and static compliance (14 +/- 20%) were significantly greater than in the 2 other groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Sighs superimposed on lung-protective mechanical ventilation with optimal PEEP improved oxygenation and static compliance in patients with early ALI/ARDS.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
19558735
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"