COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures. Failure rate, lag screw sliding and outcome with extra- and intramedullary devices (PCCP, DHS and PFN)].

AIM OF THE STUDY: The dynamic hip screw (DHS) often shows a high incidence of therapeutic failure and an impared outcome in the treatment of the unstable pertrochanteric femur fracture (31A2). Therefore often an intramedullary device is recommended. In a retrospective clinical study we examined whether the percutaneous compression plate (PCCP, Gotfried) provides advantages following unstable fractures in comparison to DHS and PFN.

METHODS: From January 2002 to April 2007 135 patients with unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures underwent internal fixation with the PCCP (n = 46, age 78.3, ASA 2.8), DHS (n = 36, age 75.9, ASA 3.0) or PFN (n = 53, age 77.2, ASA 2.8). Radiological and clinical re-examination of the patients (33 PCCP, 24 DHS, 34 PFN) was performed 17 months later.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The PCCP was implanted in less time than the DHS and PFN (59 vs. 80 vs. 79 min, p = 0.004). Radiographic screening time was low (PCCP 143 vs. DHS 146 vs. PFN 280 s, p = 0.001). Re-operations for wound infections and haematomas occurred in 2 % after PCCP, 14 % after DHS and 4 % after PFN (p = 0.058). There was a low re-operation rate for fracture fixation complications in PCCP (9 %), in contrast to DHS (25 %) and PFN (13 %, p = 0.109). Cut-out was seen more in DHS (19 %, PCCP 2 %, PFN 4 %, p = 0.005). Lag screw sliding was high with DHS (PCCP 4 mm vs. DHS 9 mm vs. PFN 6 mm, p = 0.032). There was no correlation between lag screw sliding and outcome. PCCP, DHS and PFN had the same functional results in Merle d'Aubigné and Harris hip scores.

CONCLUSIONS: Using the minimally invasive PCCP technique in unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures provides a promising therapy option especially with regard to surgical time, radiographic screening time and failure rate. Lag screw sliding was low. There was no advantage of the intramedullary device PFN.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app